Bonnot Olivier, Tanguy Marie-Laure, Consoli Angèle, Cornic Françoise, Graindorge Catherine, Laurent Claudine, Tordjman Sylvie, Cohen David
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Apr 15;158(3):356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.09.006. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
Childhood onset schizophrenia (COS) and catatonia (C) are rare and severe psychiatric disorders. The aim of this study was to compare the phenomenology of COS with and without catatonia. We examined 33 cases consecutively referred to two major public university hospitals in Paris. There were 18 cases of COS (age=15.9+/-0.8 years) and 15 of COS+C (age=15.4+/-1.4 years). Patients were referred over the course of 3 and 9 years, respectively. Psychiatric assessment included socio-demographic, clinical and psychometric variables: the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scales for the Assessment of Positive (SAPS) and Negative Symptoms (SANS), and a catatonia rating scale. Patients with COS+C appeared to be more severely ill at admission and discharge compared with COS in nearly all clinical scores. They also exhibited significantly longer episode duration (50.8 weeks+/-4.8 vs 20.6+/-19.5). On the basis of multivariate logistic regression, the only clinical measure which significantly predicted group membership was the SANS Affective Flattening score (odds ratio=1.24; 95% CI=1.06-1.43). Our findings strongly suggest that catatonic COS differs from COS in ways that extend beyond motor symptoms. The SANS and SAPS scales, commonly used in schizophrenia, are not detailed enough to accurately describe catatonia in COS. The use of a catatonia rating scale is recommended to enhance recognition of and research into COS with catatonia.
儿童期起病的精神分裂症(COS)和紧张症(C)是罕见且严重的精神障碍。本研究的目的是比较伴有和不伴有紧张症的COS的现象学。我们连续检查了转诊至巴黎两家主要公立大学医院的33例病例。其中有18例COS(年龄=15.9±0.8岁)和15例COS+C(年龄=15.4±1.4岁)。患者分别在3年和9年的时间里被转诊。精神科评估包括社会人口学、临床和心理测量变量:简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、阳性症状评定量表(SAPS)和阴性症状评定量表(SANS),以及一个紧张症评定量表。与COS相比,COS+C患者在几乎所有临床评分中入院和出院时病情似乎更严重。他们的发作持续时间也明显更长(50.8周±4.8 vs 20.6±19.5)。基于多变量逻辑回归,唯一能显著预测分组的临床指标是SANS情感平淡评分(优势比=1.24;95%置信区间=1.06-1.43)。我们的研究结果强烈表明,紧张症性COS与COS的不同之处不仅限于运动症状。精神分裂症中常用的SANS和SAPS量表不够详细,无法准确描述COS中的紧张症。建议使用紧张症评定量表以提高对伴有紧张症的COS的识别和研究。