• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Customizing scoring functions for docking.定制对接的评分函数。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2008 May;22(5):269-86. doi: 10.1007/s10822-008-9174-y. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
2
Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.用于预测配体结合构象和亲和力以及进行筛选富集的任务特定评分函数。
J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Jan 22;58(1):119-133. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00309. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
3
A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.当前对接和评分方法在药物相关系统上的详细比较。
Proteins. 2004 Aug 1;56(2):235-49. doi: 10.1002/prot.20088.
4
Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.评估蛋白质-配体相互作用的评分函数。
J Med Chem. 2004 Jun 3;47(12):3032-47. doi: 10.1021/jm030489h.
5
Parameter estimation for scoring protein-ligand interactions using negative training data.利用负训练数据对蛋白质-配体相互作用进行评分的参数估计
J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 5;49(20):5856-68. doi: 10.1021/jm050040j.
6
Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.对多种蛋白质-配体复合物上的十种对接程序进行综合评估:采样能力和评分能力的预测准确性。
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016 May 14;18(18):12964-75. doi: 10.1039/c6cp01555g. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
7
Optimized Virtual Screening Workflow: Towards Target-Based Polynomial Scoring Functions for HIV-1 Protease.优化的虚拟筛选工作流程:迈向基于靶点的HIV-1蛋白酶多项式评分函数
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2017;20(9):820-827. doi: 10.2174/1386207320666171121110019.
8
Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.最大公共结合模式(MCBM):使用多种配体信息和相互作用指纹的一致性对接评分
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Feb;48(2):319-32. doi: 10.1021/ci7003626. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
9
Enhance the performance of current scoring functions with the aid of 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints.借助三维蛋白质-配体相互作用指纹图谱提高当前评分函数的性能。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1750-5.
10
Scoring noncovalent protein-ligand interactions: a continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities.非共价蛋白质-配体相互作用的评分:一种经过调整以计算结合亲和力的连续可微函数。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1996 Oct;10(5):427-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00124474.

引用本文的文献

1
Structure-based pose prediction: Non-cognate docking extended to macrocyclic ligands.基于结构的构象预测:非同源对接扩展到大环配体。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2024 Oct 16;38(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s10822-024-00574-0.
2
In Silico Approaches to Identify Polyphenol Compounds as α-Glucosidase and α-Amylase Inhibitors against Type-II Diabetes.计算机辅助方法鉴定多酚类化合物作为 II 型糖尿病的α-葡萄糖苷酶和α-淀粉酶抑制剂
Biomolecules. 2021 Dec 14;11(12):1877. doi: 10.3390/biom11121877.
3
Ligand and Structure-Based Approaches for the Identification of Peptide Deformylase Inhibitors as Antibacterial Drugs.基于配体和结构的方法用于鉴定肽脱甲酰基酶抑制剂作为抗菌药物
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jul 15;17(7):1141. doi: 10.3390/ijms17071141.
4
A structure-guided approach for protein pocket modeling and affinity prediction.基于结构的蛋白口袋建模和亲和力预测方法。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2013 Nov;27(11):917-34. doi: 10.1007/s10822-013-9688-9. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
5
CSAR benchmark exercise 2011-2012: evaluation of results from docking and relative ranking of blinded congeneric series.CSAR 基准测试练习 2011-2012:对接结果评估和盲测同类系列的相对排名。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Aug 26;53(8):1853-70. doi: 10.1021/ci400025f. Epub 2013 May 10.
6
Lessons learned in empirical scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 benchmarking exercise.从 2011 年 CSAR 基准测试中使用 smina 进行经验评分中获得的经验教训。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Aug 26;53(8):1893-904. doi: 10.1021/ci300604z. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
7
Virtual screening of specific insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) inhibitors from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) molecular database.从美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)分子数据库中虚拟筛选特定的胰岛素样生长因子1受体(IGF1R)抑制剂。
Int J Mol Sci. 2012 Dec 14;13(12):17185-209. doi: 10.3390/ijms131217185.
8
Iterative refinement of a binding pocket model: active computational steering of lead optimization.迭代优化结合口袋模型:主动计算引导先导化合物优化。
J Med Chem. 2012 Oct 25;55(20):8926-42. doi: 10.1021/jm301210j. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
9
Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: a problem-centric review.基于结构的药物发现虚拟筛选:以问题为中心的综述。
AAPS J. 2012 Mar;14(1):133-41. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9322-0. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
10
Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?预先定义的配体构象虚拟集能否定量评估打分函数的准确性?
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 Feb;26(2):185-97. doi: 10.1007/s10822-011-9539-5. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Surflex-Dock 2.1: robust performance from ligand energetic modeling, ring flexibility, and knowledge-based search.Surflex-Dock 2.1:基于配体能量建模、环柔性和基于知识的搜索实现强大性能。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2007 May;21(5):281-306. doi: 10.1007/s10822-007-9114-2. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
2
Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.分子对接的基准测试集。
J Med Chem. 2006 Nov 16;49(23):6789-801. doi: 10.1021/jm0608356.
3
Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking.蛋白质-配体对接的打分函数。
Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2006 Oct;7(5):407-20. doi: 10.2174/138920306778559395.
4
A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.对接程序和评分函数的批判性评估。
J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 5;49(20):5912-31. doi: 10.1021/jm050362n.
5
Parameter estimation for scoring protein-ligand interactions using negative training data.利用负训练数据对蛋白质-配体相互作用进行评分的参数估计
J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 5;49(20):5856-68. doi: 10.1021/jm050040j.
6
The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates.PDBbind数据库:方法与更新
J Med Chem. 2005 Jun 16;48(12):4111-9. doi: 10.1021/jm048957q.
7
ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening.锌数据库——一个可用于虚拟筛选的商业可用化合物免费数据库。
J Chem Inf Model. 2005 Jan-Feb;45(1):177-82. doi: 10.1021/ci049714+.
8
Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols. (3). New methods and old problems in scoring function design.基于结构的虚拟筛选协议的分析与优化。(3). 评分函数设计中的新方法与老问题。
J Mol Graph Model. 2003 Sep;22(1):41-53. doi: 10.1016/S1093-3263(03)00125-6.
9
Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine.Surflex:使用基于分子相似性的搜索引擎进行全自动柔性分子对接。
J Med Chem. 2003 Feb 13;46(4):499-511. doi: 10.1021/jm020406h.
10
Acetylcholinesterase complexed with bivalent ligands related to huperzine a: experimental evidence for species-dependent protein-ligand complementarity.与石杉碱甲相关的二价配体复合的乙酰胆碱酯酶:物种依赖性蛋白质-配体互补性的实验证据。
J Am Chem Soc. 2003 Jan 15;125(2):363-73. doi: 10.1021/ja021111w.

定制对接的评分函数。

Customizing scoring functions for docking.

作者信息

Pham Tuan A, Jain Ajay N

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, Box 0128, San Francisco, CA 94143-0128, USA.

出版信息

J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2008 May;22(5):269-86. doi: 10.1007/s10822-008-9174-y. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10822-008-9174-y
PMID:18273558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3108487/
Abstract

Empirical scoring functions used in protein-ligand docking calculations are typically trained on a dataset of complexes with known affinities with the aim of generalizing across different docking applications. We report a novel method of scoring-function optimization that supports the use of additional information to constrain scoring function parameters, which can be used to focus a scoring function's training towards a particular application, such as screening enrichment. The approach combines multiple instance learning, positive data in the form of ligands of protein binding sites of known and unknown affinity and binding geometry, and negative (decoy) data of ligands thought not to bind particular protein binding sites or known not to bind in particular geometries. Performance of the method for the Surflex-Dock scoring function is shown in cross-validation studies and in eight blind test cases. Tuned functions optimized with a sufficient amount of data exhibited either improved or undiminished screening performance relative to the original function across all eight complexes. Analysis of the changes to the scoring function suggest that modifications can be learned that are related to protein-specific features such as active-site mobility.

摘要

用于蛋白质-配体对接计算的经验评分函数通常在具有已知亲和力的复合物数据集上进行训练,目的是在不同的对接应用中进行推广。我们报告了一种新的评分函数优化方法,该方法支持使用额外信息来约束评分函数参数,可用于将评分函数的训练聚焦于特定应用,如筛选富集。该方法结合了多实例学习、已知和未知亲和力及结合几何结构的蛋白质结合位点配体形式的正数据,以及被认为不结合特定蛋白质结合位点或已知不在特定几何结构中结合的配体的负(诱饵)数据。在交叉验证研究和八个盲测案例中展示了该方法对Surflex-Dock评分函数的性能。相对于原始函数,用足够数量的数据优化后的调整函数在所有八个复合物上均表现出改进或未降低的筛选性能。对评分函数变化的分析表明,可以学习到与蛋白质特异性特征(如活性位点流动性)相关的修改。