• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

借助三维蛋白质-配体相互作用指纹图谱提高当前评分函数的性能。

Enhance the performance of current scoring functions with the aid of 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints.

作者信息

Liu Jie, Su Minyi, Liu Zhihai, Li Jie, Li Yan, Wang Renxiao

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Bioorganic and Natural Products Chemistry, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Life Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 345 Lingling Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.

State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau Institute for Applied Research in Medicine and Health, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1750-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12859-017-1750-5
PMID:28720122
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5516336/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In structure-based drug design, binding affinity prediction remains as a challenging goal for current scoring functions. Development of target-biased scoring functions provides a new possibility for tackling this problem, but this approach is also associated with certain technical difficulties. We previously reported the Knowledge-Guided Scoring (KGS) method as an alternative approach (BMC Bioinformatics, 2010, 11, 193-208). The key idea is to compute the binding affinity of a given protein-ligand complex based on the known binding data of an appropriate reference complex, so the error in binding affinity prediction can be reduced effectively.

RESULTS

In this study, we have developed an upgraded version, i.e. KGS2, by employing 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in reference selection. KGS2 was evaluated in combination with four scoring functions (X-Score, ChemPLP, ASP, and GoldScore) on five drug targets (HIV-1 protease, carbonic anhydrase 2, beta-secretase 1, beta-trypsin, and checkpoint kinase 1). In the in situ scoring test, considerable improvements were observed in most cases after application of KGS2. Besides, the performance of KGS2 was always better than KGS in all cases. In the more challenging molecular docking test, application of KGS2 also led to improved structure-activity relationship in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

KGS2 can be applied as a convenient "add-on" to current scoring functions without the need to re-engineer them, and its application is not limited to certain target proteins as customized scoring functions. As an interpolation method, its accuracy in principle can be improved further with the increasing knowledge of protein-ligand complex structures and binding affinity data. We expect that KGS2 will become a practical tool for enhancing the performance of current scoring functions in binding affinity prediction. The KGS2 software is available upon contacting the authors.

摘要

背景

在基于结构的药物设计中,结合亲和力预测对于当前的评分函数而言仍是一个具有挑战性的目标。开发针对靶点的评分函数为解决这一问题提供了新的可能性,但这种方法也存在一定的技术难题。我们之前报道了知识引导评分(KGS)方法作为一种替代方法(《BMC生物信息学》,2010年,11卷,193 - 208页)。其关键思想是基于合适参考复合物的已知结合数据来计算给定蛋白质 - 配体复合物的结合亲和力,从而有效降低结合亲和力预测中的误差。

结果

在本研究中,我们通过在参考选择中采用三维蛋白质 - 配体相互作用指纹图谱开发了一个升级版,即KGS2。KGS2与四种评分函数(X - Score、ChemPLP、ASP和GoldScore)相结合,在五个药物靶点(HIV - 1蛋白酶、碳酸酐酶2、β - 分泌酶1、β - 胰蛋白酶和检查点激酶1)上进行了评估。在原位评分测试中,应用KGS2后,多数情况下观察到了显著改善。此外,在所有情况下,KGS2的性能始终优于KGS。在更具挑战性的分子对接测试中,应用KGS2在某些情况下也改善了构效关系。

结论

KGS2可以作为一种便捷的“附加”方法应用于当前的评分函数,无需对其进行重新设计,并且其应用不像定制评分函数那样局限于特定的靶蛋白。作为一种插值方法,原则上随着对蛋白质 - 配体复合物结构和结合亲和力数据的了解不断增加,其准确性可以进一步提高。我们期望KGS2将成为提高当前评分函数在结合亲和力预测中性能的实用工具。可通过联系作者获取KGS2软件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/273d7b78880c/12859_2017_1750_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/ac10800268e6/12859_2017_1750_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/076d08e1c748/12859_2017_1750_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/ba5b227bc0ba/12859_2017_1750_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/2db443b7b1a2/12859_2017_1750_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/be78db647c6e/12859_2017_1750_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/5b21e48e0f69/12859_2017_1750_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/72b258823628/12859_2017_1750_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/61e4a4237c79/12859_2017_1750_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/65be4596abbd/12859_2017_1750_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/8d44036b38ca/12859_2017_1750_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/1df0bf342dd2/12859_2017_1750_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/f90ee18ee204/12859_2017_1750_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/273d7b78880c/12859_2017_1750_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/ac10800268e6/12859_2017_1750_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/076d08e1c748/12859_2017_1750_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/ba5b227bc0ba/12859_2017_1750_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/2db443b7b1a2/12859_2017_1750_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/be78db647c6e/12859_2017_1750_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/5b21e48e0f69/12859_2017_1750_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/72b258823628/12859_2017_1750_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/61e4a4237c79/12859_2017_1750_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/65be4596abbd/12859_2017_1750_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/8d44036b38ca/12859_2017_1750_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/1df0bf342dd2/12859_2017_1750_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/f90ee18ee204/12859_2017_1750_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfc/5516336/273d7b78880c/12859_2017_1750_Fig13_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhance the performance of current scoring functions with the aid of 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints.借助三维蛋白质-配体相互作用指纹图谱提高当前评分函数的性能。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1750-5.
2
A knowledge-guided strategy for improving the accuracy of scoring functions in binding affinity prediction.一种基于知识引导的策略,用于提高结合亲和力预测中评分函数的准确性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 17;11:193. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-193.
3
An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.使用包含800个蛋白质-配体复合物的PDBbind精制集对14种评分函数进行的广泛测试。
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Nov-Dec;44(6):2114-25. doi: 10.1021/ci049733j.
4
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.更新后的基准上评分函数的比较评估:2. 评估方法与总体结果。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Jun 23;54(6):1717-36. doi: 10.1021/ci500081m. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.最大公共结合模式(MCBM):使用多种配体信息和相互作用指纹的一致性对接评分
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Feb;48(2):319-32. doi: 10.1021/ci7003626. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
6
Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions.为开发蛋白质-配体相互作用评分函数奠定基础。
Acc Chem Res. 2017 Feb 21;50(2):302-309. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00491. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
7
E-novo: an automated workflow for efficient structure-based lead optimization.E-novo:一种用于基于结构的高效先导化合物优化的自动化工作流程。
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Jul;49(7):1797-809. doi: 10.1021/ci900073k.
8
AutoDock and AutoDockTools for Protein-Ligand Docking: Beta-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1(BACE1) as a Case Study.用于蛋白质-配体对接的AutoDock和AutoDockTools:以β-分泌酶1(BACE1)为例的研究
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1598:391-403. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6952-4_20.
9
Development of a Fingerprint-Based Scoring Function for the Prediction of the Binding Mode of Carbonic Anhydrase II Inhibitors.基于指纹的打分函数用于预测碳酸酐酶 II 抑制剂的结合模式。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jun 23;19(7):1851. doi: 10.3390/ijms19071851.
10
Optimized Virtual Screening Workflow: Towards Target-Based Polynomial Scoring Functions for HIV-1 Protease.优化的虚拟筛选工作流程:迈向基于靶点的HIV-1蛋白酶多项式评分函数
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2017;20(9):820-827. doi: 10.2174/1386207320666171121110019.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncovering potential CDK9 inhibitors from natural compound databases through docking-based virtual screening and MD simulations.通过基于对接的虚拟筛选和 MD 模拟从天然化合物数据库中发现潜在的 CDK9 抑制剂。
J Mol Model. 2024 Jul 16;30(8):267. doi: 10.1007/s00894-024-06067-z.
2
Open-ComBind: harnessing unlabeled data for improved binding pose prediction.Open-ComBind:利用未标记数据提高结合构象预测。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2023 Dec 8;38(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s10822-023-00544-y.
3
Exploring Natural Alkaloids from Brazilian Biodiversity as Potential Inhibitors of the Juvenile Hormone Enzyme: A Computational Approach for Vector Mosquito Control.

本文引用的文献

1
Binding mode similarity measures for ranking of docking poses: a case study on the adenosine A2A receptor.用于对接姿势排序的结合模式相似性度量:以腺苷 A2A 受体为例的研究
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Jun;30(6):447-56. doi: 10.1007/s10822-016-9918-z. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
2
Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.对多种蛋白质-配体复合物上的十种对接程序进行综合评估:采样能力和评分能力的预测准确性。
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016 May 14;18(18):12964-75. doi: 10.1039/c6cp01555g. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
3
Three-Dimensional Similarity in Molecular Docking: Prioritizing Ligand Poses on the Basis of Experimental Binding Modes.
探索巴西生物多样性中的天然生物碱作为保幼激素酶抑制剂的潜力:一种用于病媒蚊虫控制的计算方法。
Molecules. 2023 Sep 29;28(19):6871. doi: 10.3390/molecules28196871.
4
Recent Advances in In Silico Target Fishing.计算机辅助药物靶点发现的最新进展
Molecules. 2021 Aug 24;26(17):5124. doi: 10.3390/molecules26175124.
5
In Silico Study Identified Methotrexate Analog as Potential Inhibitor of Drug Resistant Human Dihydrofolate Reductase for Cancer Therapeutics.计算机模拟研究鉴定氨甲蝶呤类似物为潜在的耐药型人二氢叶酸还原酶抑制剂用于癌症治疗。
Molecules. 2020 Jul 31;25(15):3510. doi: 10.3390/molecules25153510.
6
Nonparametric chemical descriptors for the calculation of ligand-biopolymer affinities with machine-learning scoring functions.用于计算配体-生物聚合物亲和力的非参数化学描述符与机器学习打分函数。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2019 Nov;33(11):943-953. doi: 10.1007/s10822-019-00248-2. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
7
Molecular Docking: Shifting Paradigms in Drug Discovery.分子对接:药物发现中的范式转变。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 4;20(18):4331. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184331.
8
Prediction Methods of Herbal Compounds in Chinese Medicinal Herbs.中草药中草药化合物的预测方法。
Molecules. 2018 Sep 10;23(9):2303. doi: 10.3390/molecules23092303.
9
Development of a Fingerprint-Based Scoring Function for the Prediction of the Binding Mode of Carbonic Anhydrase II Inhibitors.基于指纹的打分函数用于预测碳酸酐酶 II 抑制剂的结合模式。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jun 23;19(7):1851. doi: 10.3390/ijms19071851.
分子对接中的三维相似性:基于实验结合模式对配体构象进行优先级排序。
J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Mar 28;56(3):580-7. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00745. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
4
BindingDB in 2015: A public database for medicinal chemistry, computational chemistry and systems pharmacology.2015年的BindingDB:一个用于药物化学、计算化学和系统药理学的公共数据库。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D1045-53. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1072. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
5
Classification of current scoring functions.现行评分函数分类。
J Chem Inf Model. 2015 Mar 23;55(3):475-82. doi: 10.1021/ci500731a. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
6
Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.通过现代自由能计算方案和力场,准确可靠地预测潜在药物发现中相对配体结合效力。
J Am Chem Soc. 2015 Feb 25;137(7):2695-703. doi: 10.1021/ja512751q. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
7
PDB-wide collection of binding data: current status of the PDBbind database.PDB 范围内的结合数据集合:PDBbind 数据库的当前状态。
Bioinformatics. 2015 Feb 1;31(3):405-12. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu626. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
8
Structural protein-ligand interaction fingerprints (SPLIF) for structure-based virtual screening: method and benchmark study.用于基于结构的虚拟筛选的结构蛋白-配体相互作用指纹(SPLIF):方法与基准研究
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Sep 22;54(9):2555-61. doi: 10.1021/ci500319f. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
9
Challenges, applications, and recent advances of protein-ligand docking in structure-based drug design.基于结构的药物设计中蛋白质-配体对接的挑战、应用及最新进展。
Molecules. 2014 Jul 11;19(7):10150-76. doi: 10.3390/molecules190710150.
10
Scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions: a critical perspective.蛋白质-配体相互作用的评分函数:批判性视角
Drug Discov Today Technol. 2004 Dec;1(3):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.08.004.