Li Lina, Yu Qianqian, Wang Yuru, Wang Zhihao, Zhou Xinyi, Guan Qing, Luo Yue-Jia, Li Hehui
Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, PR China.
English Department, Jilin Medical College, Jilin, PR China.
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 25;10(9):e30061. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30061. eCollection 2024 May 15.
Extensive studies have been conducted on the impact of foreign language reading anxiety on reading, primarily focusing on pedagogy and behavior but lacking electrophysiological evidence. The current study aimed to investigate the influence of foreign language reading anxiety on reading and its underlying mechanisms. The results revealed a negative correlation between foreign language reading anxiety and foreign language reading performance, irrespective of the native language. Adults with low levels of foreign language reading anxiety (LFLRA) demonstrated a significant difference in early lexical component N170 amplitude between foreign and native languages. However, this effect was not observed in adults with high levels of foreign language reading anxiety (HFLRA). In terms of N170 latency, HFLRA showed a longer N170 for the foreign language compared to the native language. Furthermore, the N170 effects were predominantly localized over the left occipitotemporal electrodes. Regarding N400 latency, a significant difference was found in LFLRA individuals between foreign and native language processing, while HFLRA individuals did not exhibit this difference. These findings suggest that HFLRA individuals experience inefficient lexical processing (such as orthography or semantics) during reading in foreign language.
对外语阅读焦虑对阅读的影响已进行了广泛研究,主要集中在教学法和行为方面,但缺乏电生理证据。本研究旨在探讨外语阅读焦虑对阅读的影响及其潜在机制。结果显示,无论母语如何,外语阅读焦虑与外语阅读成绩呈负相关。低水平外语阅读焦虑(LFLRA)的成年人在处理外语和母语时,早期词汇成分N170波幅存在显著差异。然而,高水平外语阅读焦虑(HFLRA)的成年人未观察到这种效应。就N170潜伏期而言,HFLRA者处理外语时的N170潜伏期比处理母语时更长。此外,N170效应主要集中在左侧枕颞电极。关于N400潜伏期,LFLRA者在处理外语和母语时存在显著差异,而HFLRA者未表现出这种差异。这些发现表明,HFLRA者在外语阅读过程中存在低效的词汇处理(如正字法或语义)。