Kerry Roger, Taylor Alan J, Mitchell Jeanette, McCarthy Chris
Division of Physiotherapy Education, University of Nottingham, UK.
Man Ther. 2008 Aug;13(4):278-88. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.10.006. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
An abundance of literature has attempted to provide insight into the association between cervical spine manual therapy and cervical artery dysfunction leading to cerebral ischaemic events. Additionally, specific guidelines have been developed to assist manual therapists in clinical decision-making. Despite this, there remains a lack of agreement within the profession on many issues. This paper presents a critical, re-examination of relevant literature with the aim of providing a contemporary, evidence-informed review of key areas regarding the neurovascular risks of cervical spine manual therapy. From a consideration of case reviews and surveys, haemodynamic principles, and blood flow studies, the authors suggest that: (1) it is currently impossible to meaningfully estimate the size of the risk of post-treatment complications; (2) existing testing procedures have limited clinical utility; and (3) a consideration of the association between pre-existing vascular risk factors, combined with a system based approach to cervical arterial haemodynamics (inclusive of the carotid system), may assist manual therapists in identifying at-risk patients.
大量文献试图深入探讨颈椎手法治疗与导致脑缺血事件的颈动脉功能障碍之间的关联。此外,还制定了特定指南以协助手法治疗师进行临床决策。尽管如此,该行业在许多问题上仍未达成共识。本文对相关文献进行了批判性的重新审视,旨在对颈椎手法治疗的神经血管风险关键领域提供当代的、基于证据的综述。通过对病例回顾与调查、血流动力学原理及血流研究的考量,作者认为:(1)目前无法有意义地估计治疗后并发症风险的大小;(2)现有检测程序的临床效用有限;(3)考虑既往血管危险因素之间的关联,并结合基于系统方法的颈动脉血流动力学(包括颈动脉系统),可能有助于手法治疗师识别高危患者。