Cockram James, White Jon, Leigh Fiona J, Lea Vincent J, Chiapparino Elena, Laurie David A, Mackay Ian J, Powell Wayne, O'Sullivan Donal M
Centre for Plant Genetics, Breeding and Evaluation, National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge, UK.
BMC Genet. 2008 Feb 18;9:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-16.
Association mapping, initially developed in human disease genetics, is now being applied to plant species. The model species Arabidopsis provided some of the first examples of association mapping in plants, identifying previously cloned flowering time genes, despite high population sub-structure. More recently, association genetics has been applied to barley, where breeding activity has resulted in a high degree of population sub-structure. A major genotypic division within barley is that between winter- and spring-sown varieties, which differ in their requirement for vernalization to promote subsequent flowering. To date, all attempts to validate association genetics in barley by identifying major flowering time loci that control vernalization requirement (VRN-H1 and VRN-H2) have failed. Here, we validate the use of association genetics in barley by identifying VRN-H1 and VRN-H2, despite their prominent role in determining population sub-structure.
By taking barley as a typical inbreeding crop, and seasonal growth habit as a major partitioning phenotype, we develop an association mapping approach which successfully identifies VRN-H1 and VRN-H2, the underlying loci largely responsible for this agronomic division. We find a combination of Structured Association followed by Genomic Control to correct for population structure and inflation of the test statistic, resolved significant associations only with VRN-H1 and the VRN-H2 candidate genes, as well as two genes closely linked to VRN-H1 (HvCSFs1 and HvPHYC).
We show that, after employing appropriate statistical methods to correct for population sub-structure, the genome-wide partitioning effect of allelic status at VRN-H1 and VRN-H2 does not result in the high levels of spurious association expected to occur in highly structured samples. Furthermore, we demonstrate that both VRN-H1 and the candidate VRN-H2 genes can be identified using association mapping. Discrimination between intragenic VRN-H1 markers was achieved, indicating that candidate causative polymorphisms may be discerned and prioritised within a larger set of positive associations. This proof of concept study demonstrates the feasibility of association mapping in barley, even within highly structured populations. A major advantage of this method is that it does not require large numbers of genome-wide markers, and is therefore suitable for fine mapping and candidate gene evaluation, especially in species for which large numbers of genetic markers are either unavailable or too costly.
关联作图最初是在人类疾病遗传学中发展起来的,现在正应用于植物物种。模式植物拟南芥提供了一些植物关联作图的最早例子,尽管群体亚结构程度很高,但仍鉴定出了先前克隆的开花时间基因。最近,关联遗传学已应用于大麦,其育种活动导致了高度的群体亚结构。大麦内一个主要的基因型划分是冬播和春播品种之间的划分,它们在促进后续开花所需的春化条件方面存在差异。迄今为止,通过鉴定控制春化需求(VRN-H1和VRN-H2)的主要开花时间基因座来验证大麦关联遗传学的所有尝试均告失败。在此,我们通过鉴定VRN-H1和VRN-H2验证了关联遗传学在大麦中的应用,尽管它们在决定群体亚结构方面起着重要作用。
以大麦作为典型的自交作物,并将季节性生长习性作为主要的划分表型,我们开发了一种关联作图方法,该方法成功鉴定出VRN-H1和VRN-H2,这两个基因座是造成这种农艺划分的主要原因。我们发现采用结构化关联分析,随后进行基因组控制以校正群体结构和检验统计量的膨胀,仅与VRN-H1、VRN-H2候选基因以及与VRN-H1紧密连锁的两个基因(HvCSFs1和HvPHYC)解析出了显著关联。
我们表明,在采用适当的统计方法校正群体亚结构后,VRN-H1和VRN-H2等位基因状态的全基因组划分效应不会导致在高度结构化样本中预期出现的高水平虚假关联。此外,我们证明了使用关联作图可以鉴定VRN-H1和候选VRN-H2基因。实现了基因内VRN-H1标记之间的区分,表明可以在更大的一组阳性关联中识别和优先考虑候选致病多态性。这项概念验证研究证明了在大麦中进行关联作图的可行性,即使是在高度结构化的群体中。该方法的一个主要优点是它不需要大量的全基因组标记,因此适用于精细作图和候选基因评估,特别是对于那些无法获得大量遗传标记或成本过高的物种。