Sacco Paul, Cunningham-Williams Renee M, Ostmann Emily, Spitznagel Edward L
George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2008 Oct;42(13):1122-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.11.007. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
Research supports increased risk of problem gambling (PG) and pathological gambling disorder (PGD) among individuals with substance abuse/dependence and psychiatric disorders, but studies considering personality disorder comorbidity have not adjusted for confounding relationships with other Axis I disorders. Using targeted advertising, we enrolled 153 gamblers (55% female; 32% minority; Mean age=47; SD=18.2) in a clinical validation study of the newly developed computerized gambling assessment module (C-GAM). For these analyses, we classified gamblers into three groups based on their endorsement of DSM-IV PGD: Non-gamblers (0 criteria; n=64; 44%); PG (1-4 criteria; n=60; 41%); and PGD (5-10 criteria; n=22; 15%). We evaluated PG and PGD risk associated with personality disorder pathology using the computerized structured clinical interview of DSM-IV Axis II (SCID-II). Using multinomial logistic regression, we found increased odds of PGD among individuals with greater symptoms of borderline personality disorder after adjusting for socio-demographics, substance abuse/dependence and other personality disorders significant at the bivariate level. Yet after adjusting for depressive symptoms, borderline personality disorder criteria were nonsignificant, suggesting a complex relationship between personality pathology, depression, and gambling. These findings bolster the position that further investigation is needed regarding the association of gambling pathology with personality disorders and depressive symptoms.
研究表明,物质滥用/依赖者和精神疾病患者出现问题赌博(PG)及病态赌博障碍(PGD)的风险增加,但考虑人格障碍共病情况的研究并未对与其他轴I障碍的混杂关系进行校正。我们通过定向广告,招募了153名赌徒(55%为女性;32%为少数族裔;平均年龄=47岁;标准差=18.2)参与新开发的计算机化赌博评估模块(C-GAM)的临床验证研究。在这些分析中,我们根据赌徒对DSM-IV中PGD的认可情况将其分为三组:非赌徒(0条标准;n=64;44%);问题赌博者(1-4条标准;n=60;41%);以及病态赌博障碍者(5-10条标准;n=22;15%)。我们使用DSM-IV轴II的计算机化结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)评估与人格障碍病理相关的PG和PGD风险。通过多项逻辑回归分析,我们发现,在对社会人口统计学、物质滥用/依赖及双变量水平上显著的其他人格障碍进行校正后,边缘型人格障碍症状较重的个体出现PGD的几率增加。然而,在对抑郁症状进行校正后,边缘型人格障碍标准不再显著,这表明人格病理、抑郁和赌博之间存在复杂关系。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即需要进一步研究赌博病理与人格障碍及抑郁症状之间的关联。