Yetter Mike, Moir Gavin L
Exercise Science Department, East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania, East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jan;22(1):159-65. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f958d.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of performing heavy back squats (HBS) and heavy front squats (HFS) on the average speed during each 10-m interval of 40-m sprint trials. In a randomized, cross-over design, 10 strength-trained men performed a HBS, HFS, or control treatment before performing three 40-m sprint trials separated by 3 minutes. The HBS and HFS treatments consisted of performing parallel back or front squats with 30%, 50%, and 70% of the subject's 1 repetition maximum after 5 minutes of cycling. The control treatment consisted of cycling for 5 minutes. The sprint trials were performed 4 minutes after completing the HBS, HFS, or control treatments. Significant increases in speed were found during the 10- to 20-m interval for the HBS compared with the control treatment (mean difference, 0.12 m x s(-1); 95% likely range, 0.05-0.18 m x s(-1); P = 0.001). During the 30- to 40-m interval, HBS produced significantly greater speeds compared with the HFS treatment (mean difference, 0.24 m x s(-1); 95% likely range, 0.02-0.45 m x s(-1); P = 0.034) and the control treatment (mean difference, 0.18 m x s(-1); 95% likely range, 0.03-0.32 m x s(-1); P = 0.021). The differing effects of the treatments may reflect different levels of muscular activation or different mechanical aspects of the squat exercises. Similarly, the multidimensional nature of sprint running means that other specific exercises may confer improvements in sprinting performance during other intervals. It is suggested that coaches could incorporate HBS into the warm-up procedure of athletes to improve sprinting performance.
本研究的目的是调查进行大重量后深蹲(HBS)和大重量前深蹲(HFS)对40米短跑测试中每10米区间平均速度的影响。在一项随机交叉设计中,10名经过力量训练的男性在进行三次间隔3分钟的40米短跑测试之前,分别接受了HBS、HFS或对照处理。HBS和HFS处理包括在骑行5分钟后,以受试者1次重复最大值的30%、50%和70%进行平行后蹲或前蹲。对照处理包括骑行5分钟。在完成HBS、HFS或对照处理4分钟后进行短跑测试。与对照处理相比,HBS在10至20米区间的速度显著增加(平均差异为0.12米/秒;95%可能范围为0.05 - 0.18米/秒;P = 0.001)。在30至40米区间,与HFS处理相比,HBS产生的速度显著更快(平均差异为0.24米/秒;95%可能范围为0.02 - 0.45米/秒;P = 0.034),与对照处理相比也是如此(平均差异为0.18米/秒;95%可能范围为0.03 - 0.32米/秒;P = 0.021)。不同处理的不同效果可能反映了肌肉激活水平的差异或深蹲练习的不同力学方面。同样,短跑的多维性质意味着其他特定练习可能会在其他区间提高短跑成绩。建议教练可以将HBS纳入运动员的热身程序,以提高短跑成绩。