Ronnestad Bent R, Kvamme Nils H, Sunde Arnstein, Raastad Truls
Faculty of Social Science, Lillehammer University College, Lillehammer, Norway.
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 May;22(3):773-80. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816a5e86.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of combined strength and plyometric training with strength training alone on power-related measurements in professional soccer players. Subjects in the intervention team were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group ST (n = 6) performed heavy strength training twice a week for 7 weeks in addition to 6 to 8 soccer sessions a week. Group ST+P (n = 8) performed a plyometric training program in addition to the same training as the ST group. The control group (n = 7) performed 6 to 8 soccer sessions a week. Pretests and posttests were 1 repetition maximum (1RM) half squat, countermovement jump (CMJ), squat jump (SJ), 4-bounce test (4BT), peak power in half squat with 20 kg, 35 kg, and 50 kg (PP20, PP35, and PP50, respectively), sprint acceleration, peak sprint velocity, and total time on 40-m sprint. There were no significant differences between the ST+P group and ST group. Thus, the groups were pooled into 1 intervention group. The intervention group significantly improved in all measurements except CMJ, while the control group showed significant improvements only in PP20. There was a significant difference in relative improvement between the intervention group and control group in 1RM half squat, 4BT, and SJ. However, a significant difference between groups was not observed in PP20, PP35, sprint acceleration, peak sprinting velocity, and total time on 40-m sprint. The results suggest that there are no significant performance-enhancing effects of combining strength and plyometric training in professional soccer players concurrently performing 6 to 8 soccer sessions a week compared to strength training alone. However, heavy strength training leads to significant gains in strength and power-related measurements in professional soccer players.
本研究的目的是比较力量训练与增强式训练相结合和单纯力量训练对职业足球运动员与功率相关测量指标的影响。干预组的受试者被随机分为两组。ST组(n = 6)除每周进行6至8次足球训练外,每周进行两次高强度力量训练,持续7周。ST+P组(n = 8)除了与ST组相同的训练外,还进行增强式训练计划。对照组(n = 7)每周进行6至8次足球训练。预测试和后测试包括1次重复最大值(1RM)半蹲、反向纵跳(CMJ)、深蹲跳(SJ)、4次弹跳测试(4BT)、20 kg、35 kg和50 kg半蹲时的峰值功率(分别为PP20、PP35和PP50)、短跑加速、峰值短跑速度以及40米短跑的总时间。ST+P组和ST组之间没有显著差异。因此,将这两组合并为1个干预组。干预组除CMJ外,所有测量指标均有显著改善,而对照组仅在PP20上有显著改善。干预组和对照组在1RM半蹲、4BT和SJ的相对改善方面存在显著差异。然而,在PP20、PP35、短跑加速、峰值短跑速度和40米短跑总时间方面,两组之间未观察到显著差异。结果表明,与单纯力量训练相比,对于每周同时进行6至8次足球训练的职业足球运动员,力量训练与增强式训练相结合并没有显著的提高运动表现的效果。然而,高强度力量训练能使职业足球运动员在力量和与功率相关的测量指标上有显著提高。