Suppr超能文献

肩部手术中,围手术期肌间沟阻滞与关节腔内注射局部麻醉药用于术后镇痛的比较。

Perioperative interscalene block versus intra-articular injection of local anesthetics for postoperative analgesia in shoulder surgery.

作者信息

Beaudet Véronique, Williams Stephan R, Tétreault Patrice, Perrault Michel-Antoine

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Montreal, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008 Mar-Apr;33(2):134-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.10.005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Up to 70% of patients report moderate to severe pain after shoulder surgery, which can compromise early rehabilitation and functional recuperation. Postoperative shoulder pain control is improved with both interscalene block and intra-articular local anesthetic injection. The present study hypothesized that perioperative interscalene analgesia would offer pain control superior to perioperative intra-articular local anesthetics over the first 24 hours after surgery.

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: group IS had interscalene block with catheter installation, while group IA received intra-articular local anesthetic, also with catheter installation. All patients received 3 local anesthetic injections: 0.25 mL/kg of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 2.5 microg/mL immediately before and after surgery, and 0.25 mL/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 2.5 microg/mL 1 hour after the end of surgery, after which the catheters were removed, and no further local anesthetics were administered. Postoperative pain at rest was evaluated in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), 3 hours, 6 hours and 24 hours after surgery. The area under the 24 hour pain over time curve was calculated. Hydromorphone consumption in the PACU and over 24 hours was recorded.

RESULTS

Pain scores (IS: 0.4 +/- 2 vs. IA: 4 +/- 3, P < .0001) and opioid consumption (IS: 0.7 mg +/- 1.4 vs. IA: 1.5 mg +/- 1.2, P = .02) were significantly higher in the PACU for group IA. However, neither the mean pain scores over the first day after surgery (IS: 5 +/- 2 vs. IA: 5 +/- 3; P = .4) nor 24-hour opioid consumption (IS: 4.4 mg +/- 2.8 vs. IA: 4.2 mg +/- 2.6; P = .4) were significantly higher in group IA.

CONCLUSIONS

PACU measurements of immediate postoperative pain and narcotic consumption favor perioperative interscalene analgesia over intra-articular analgesia. This benefit does not translate into lower overall pain for the first 24 hours after surgery.

摘要

背景与目的

高达70%的患者在肩部手术后报告有中度至重度疼痛,这可能会影响早期康复和功能恢复。肌间沟阻滞和关节内局部麻醉注射均可改善术后肩部疼痛控制。本研究假设,在术后的头24小时内,围手术期肌间沟镇痛在疼痛控制方面优于围手术期关节内局部麻醉。

方法

60例行肩部手术的患者被随机分为2组中的1组:肌间沟阻滞组(IS组)安装导管,关节内局部麻醉组(IA组)也安装导管。所有患者均接受3次局部麻醉注射:手术前后立即注射0.25 mL/kg的2%利多卡因加2.5 μg/mL肾上腺素,手术结束1小时后注射0.25 mL/kg的0.5%布比卡因加2.5 μg/mL肾上腺素,之后拔除导管,不再给予进一步的局部麻醉。在麻醉后恢复室(PACU)、术后3小时、6小时和24小时评估静息时的术后疼痛。计算24小时疼痛随时间变化曲线下的面积。记录PACU及24小时内氢吗啡酮的消耗量。

结果

IA组在PACU的疼痛评分(IS组:0.4±2 vs. IA组:4±3,P<.0001)和阿片类药物消耗量(IS组:0.7 mg±1.4 vs. IA组:1.5 mg±1.2,P=.02)显著更高。然而,IA组术后第一天的平均疼痛评分(IS组:5±2 vs. IA组:5±3;P=.4)和24小时阿片类药物消耗量(IS组:4.4 mg±2.8 vs. IA组:4.2 mg±2.6;P=.4)均无显著更高。

结论

PACU对术后即刻疼痛和麻醉药物消耗量的测量结果显示,围手术期肌间沟镇痛优于关节内镇痛。但这一益处并未转化为术后24小时内总体疼痛减轻。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验