Beall Melissa J, Chandrashekar Ramaswamy, Eberts Matthew D, Cyr Katie E, Diniz Pedro Paulo V P, Mainville Celine, Hegarty Barbara C, Crawford John M, Breitschwerdt Edward B
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, Maine, USA.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008 Aug;8(4):455-64. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2007.0236.
A population of 731 naturally exposed pet dogs examined at a private practice in Baxter, Minnesota, an area endemic for Lyme disease and anaplasmosis, was tested by serological and molecular methods for evidence of exposure to or infection with selected vector-borne pathogens. Serum samples were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, and Ehrlichia canis antibodies and for Dirofilaria immitis antigen. Blood samples from 273 dogs were also analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species DNA. Based on the owner history and the attending veterinarian's physical examination findings, dogs exhibiting illness compatible with anaplasmosis or borreliosis were considered clinical cases, and their results were compared to the healthy dog population. Antibodies to only A. phagocytophilum were detected in 217 (29%) dogs; to only B. burgdorferi, in 80 (11%) dogs; and seroreactivity to both organisms, in 188 (25%) dogs. Of 89 suspected cases of canine anaplasmosis or borreliosis, A. phagocytophilum or B. burgdorferi antibodies were detected in 22 dogs (25%) and 8 dogs (9%) respectively, whereas antibodies to both organisms were found in 38 dogs (43%). Ehrlichia canis antibodies and D. immitis antigen were each detected in 11 (1.5%) dogs. Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA was amplified from 7 of 222 (3%) healthy dogs and 19 of 51 (37%) clinical cases. Seroreactivity to both A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi was detected more frequently in suspected cases of anaplasmosis and/or borreliosis than seroreactivity to either organism alone. Based on PCR testing, A. phagocytophilum DNA was more prevalent in suspected cases of anaplasmosis or borreliosis than in healthy dogs from the same region.
在明尼苏达州巴克斯特的一家私人诊所对731只自然暴露的宠物狗进行了检查,该地区是莱姆病和无形体病的流行地区,通过血清学和分子方法检测这些宠物狗是否接触过或感染了特定的媒介传播病原体。通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测血清样本中的嗜吞噬细胞无形体、伯氏疏螺旋体和犬埃立克体抗体以及犬恶丝虫抗原。还对273只狗的血液样本进行了聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析,以检测无形体属和埃立克体属物种的DNA。根据主人的病史和主治兽医的体格检查结果,表现出与无形体病或疏螺旋体病相符病症的狗被视为临床病例,并将其结果与健康狗群体进行比较。仅在217只(29%)狗中检测到嗜吞噬细胞无形体抗体;仅在80只(11%)狗中检测到伯氏疏螺旋体抗体;在188只(25%)狗中检测到对两种病原体的血清反应性。在89例疑似犬无形体病或疏螺旋体病病例中,分别在22只(25%)狗和8只(9%)狗中检测到嗜吞噬细胞无形体或伯氏疏螺旋体抗体,而在38只(43%)狗中发现了对两种病原体的抗体。在11只(1.5%)狗中分别检测到犬埃立克体抗体和犬恶丝虫抗原。从222只健康狗中的7只(3%)和51只临床病例中的19只(37%)扩增出嗜吞噬细胞无形体DNA。在疑似无形体病和/或疏螺旋体病病例中,检测到对嗜吞噬细胞无形体和伯氏疏螺旋体的血清反应性的频率高于仅对任一病原体的血清反应性。基于PCR检测,嗜吞噬细胞无形体DNA在疑似无形体病或疏螺旋体病病例中比来自同一地区的健康狗中更普遍。