Suppr超能文献

与助产士可及性和连续性相关的计划在家分娩中的转诊:一项基于全国人口的研究。

Transfers in planned home births related to midwife availability and continuity: a nationwide population-based study.

作者信息

Lindgren Helena E, Hildingsson Ingegerd M, Christensson Kyllike, Rådestad Ingela J

机构信息

Division for Reproductive and Perinatal Health, Department of Woman and Child Health, Karolinska University, Stockholm.

出版信息

Birth. 2008 Mar;35(1):9-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00206.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Planning a home birth does not necessarily mean that the birth will take place successfully at home. The object of this study was to describe reasons and risk factors for transfer to hospital during or shortly after a planned home birth.

METHODS

A nationwide study including all women who had given birth at home in Sweden between January 1, 1992, and July 31, 2005. A total of 735 women had given birth to 1,038 children. One questionnaire for each planned home birth was sent to the women. Of the 1,038 questionnaires, 1,025 were returned. Reasons for transfer and obstetric, socioeconomic, and care-related risk factors for being transferred were measured using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Women were transferred in 12.5 percent of the planned home births. Transfers were more common among primiparas compared with multiparas (relative risk [RR] 2.5; 95% CI 1.8-3.5). Failure to progress and unavailability of the chosen midwife at the onset of labor were the reasons for 46 and 14 percent of transfers, respectively. For primiparas, the risk was four times greater if a midwife other than the one who carried out the prenatal checkups assisted at the birth (RR 4.4; 95% CI 2.1-9.5). A pregnancy exceeding 42 weeks increased the risk of transfer for both primiparas (RR 3.0; 95% CI 1.1-9.4) and multiparas (RR 3.4; 95% CI 1.3-9.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The most common reasons for transfer to hospital during or shortly after delivery were failure to progress followed by the midwife's unavailability at the onset of labor. Primiparas whose midwife for checkups during pregnancy was different from the one who assisted at the home birth were at increased risk of being transferred.

摘要

背景

计划在家分娩并不一定意味着分娩会在家中顺利进行。本研究的目的是描述计划在家分娩期间或之后不久转院的原因和风险因素。

方法

一项全国性研究,纳入了1992年1月1日至2005年7月31日期间在瑞典在家分娩的所有妇女。共有735名妇女分娩了1038名儿童。针对每次计划在家分娩向这些妇女发送一份问卷。在1038份问卷中,有1025份被退回。使用逻辑回归分析转院原因以及转院的产科、社会经济和护理相关风险因素。

结果

在计划在家分娩中,12.5%的产妇被转院。初产妇中转院情况比经产妇更常见(相对风险[RR]2.5;95%置信区间1.8 - 3.5)。产程无进展和临产后所选助产士无法到场分别是46%和14%的转院原因。对于初产妇,如果接生的助产士不是进行产前检查的助产士,转院风险会增加四倍(RR 4.4;95%置信区间2.1 - 9.5)。孕周超过42周会增加初产妇(RR 3.0;95%置信区间1.1 - 9.4)和经产妇(RR 3.4;95%置信区间1.3 - 9.0)的转院风险。

结论

分娩期间或之后不久转院的最常见原因是产程无进展,其次是临产后助产士无法到场。孕期进行产前检查的助产士与在家分娩时协助的助产士不同的初产妇转院风险增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验