Suppr超能文献

芬兰野生水禽中的正粘病毒、副粘病毒和黄病毒感染。

Orthomyxo-, paramyxo- and flavivirus infections in wild waterfowl in Finland.

作者信息

Lindh Erika, Huovilainen Anita, Rätti Osmo, Ek-Kommonen Christine, Sironen Tarja, Huhtamo Eili, Pöysä Hannu, Vaheri Antti, Vapalahti Olli

机构信息

Department of Virology, Haartman Institute, Faculty of Medicine, P,O, Box 21, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Virol J. 2008 Feb 28;5:35. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-5-35.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening wild birds for viral pathogens has become increasingly important. We tested a screening approach based on blood and cloacal and tracheal swabs collected by hunters to study the prevalence of influenza A, paramyxo-, flavi-, and alphaviruses in Finnish wild waterfowl, which has been previously unknown. We studied 310 blood samples and 115 mixed tracheal and cloacal swabs collected from hunted waterfowl in 2006. Samples were screened by RT-PCR and serologically by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for influenza A (FLUAV), type 1 avian paramyxo-(APMV-1), Sindbis (SINV), West Nile (WNV) and tick-borne encephalitis (TBEV) virus infections.

RESULTS

FLUAV RNA was found in 13 tracheal/cloacal swabs and seven strains were isolated. Five blood samples were antibody positive. Six APMV-1 RNA-positive samples were found from which four strains were isolated, while two blood samples were antibody positive. None of the birds were positive for flavivirus RNA but three birds had flavivirus antibodies by HI test. No antibodies to SINV were detected.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that circulation of both influenza A virus and avian paramyxovirus-1 in Finnish wild waterfowl was documented. The FLUAV and APMV-1 prevalences in wild waterfowl were 11.3% and 5.2% respectively, by this study. The subtype H3N8 was the only detected FLUAV subtype while APMV-1 strains clustered into two distinct lineages. Notably, antibodies to a likely mosquito-borne flavivirus were detected in three samples. The screening approach based on hunted waterfowl seemed reliable for monitoring FLUAV and APMV by RT-PCR from cloacal or tracheal samples, but antibody testing in this format seemed to be of low sensitivity.

摘要

背景

对野生鸟类进行病毒病原体筛查变得越来越重要。我们测试了一种基于猎人采集的血液、泄殖腔和气管拭子的筛查方法,以研究甲型流感病毒、副粘病毒、黄病毒和甲病毒在芬兰野生水禽中的流行情况,此前这方面情况未知。我们研究了2006年从猎获的水禽中采集的310份血液样本和115份气管与泄殖腔混合拭子。通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)对样本进行筛查,并通过血凝抑制(HI)试验或酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行血清学检测,以检测甲型流感病毒(FLUAV)、1型禽副粘病毒(APMV-1)、辛德毕斯病毒(SINV)、西尼罗河病毒(WNV)和蜱传脑炎病毒(TBEV)感染。

结果

在13份气管/泄殖腔拭子中发现了FLUAV RNA,并分离出7株病毒。5份血液样本抗体呈阳性。发现6份APMV-1 RNA阳性样本,从中分离出4株病毒,同时2份血液样本抗体呈阳性。没有鸟类的黄病毒RNA呈阳性,但有3只鸟通过HI试验检测出黄病毒抗体。未检测到针对SINV的抗体。

结论

我们得出结论,已证明甲型流感病毒和禽副粘病毒-1在芬兰野生水禽中传播。通过本研究,野生水禽中FLUAV和APMV-1的流行率分别为11.3%和5.2%。H3N8亚型是唯一检测到的FLUAV亚型,而APMV-1毒株分为两个不同的谱系。值得注意的是,在3份样本中检测到了针对一种可能由蚊子传播的黄病毒的抗体。基于猎获水禽的筛查方法似乎对于通过RT-PCR从泄殖腔或气管样本中监测FLUAV和APMV是可靠的,但这种形式的抗体检测似乎灵敏度较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c870/2292701/d17545ed9456/1743-422X-5-35-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验