Suppr超能文献

HIV/HCV 合并感染患者中非侵入性肝纤维化生物标志物的比较:Fibrovic 研究——法国国家艾滋病研究机构(ANRS)HC02

Comparison of non-invasive liver fibrosis biomarkers in HIV/HCV co-infected patients: the fibrovic study--ANRS HC02.

作者信息

Cacoub Patrice, Carrat Fabrice, Bédossa Pierre, Lambert Jérôme, Pénaranda Guillaume, Perronne Christian, Pol Stanislas, Halfon Philippe

机构信息

Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, CNRS, UMR 7087, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2008 May;48(5):765-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.01.025. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare non-invasive biological liver fibrosis scores, as alternatives to liver biopsy, in HIV/HCV co-infected patients.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-two HIV/HCV patients, nai ve for HCV treatment, underwent liver biopsy [197 (72%) men, 39.9 years, fibrosis stage (Metavir) F1 (25%), F2 (40%), F3 (25%), F4 (10%), median CD4 486/mm(3) and median HIV viral load 3.5log. Fibrotest (FT), Hepascore (HS), Fibrometer (FM), SHASTA, APRI, Forns index, and Fib-4 were tested in order to differentiate patients with mild to moderate fibrosis (F2) and those with advanced fibrosis (F3). The AUROC and the rate of well-classified patients were compared to liver biopsy.

RESULTS

FT, HS, and FM were able to stage liver fibrosis in all patients with AUROCs of 0.78, 0.84 and 0.89 for the diagnosis of F2, respectively. The correlation coefficient indexes were 0.37, 0.46 and 0.48, respectively. The rates of well-classified patients were 62%, 68% and 71%, respectively. Fib-4, APRI and the Forn's index were only able to stage 37-61% of patients and showed lower accuracies. Using a combination of FT, HS and FM did not significantly increase the performance of each test.

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV/HCV co-infected patients, Fibrometer, Hepascore and Fibrotest outperformed other non-invasive liver fibrosis biomarkers for the prediction of significant liver fibrosis.

摘要

背景/目的:比较非侵入性生物肝纤维化评分在HIV/HCV合并感染患者中作为肝活检替代方法的效果。

方法

272例未经HCV治疗的HIV/HCV患者接受了肝活检[197例(72%)男性,年龄39.9岁,纤维化分期(梅塔维分类法)F1(25%)、F2(40%)、F3(25%)、F4(10%),CD4中位数为486/mm³,HIV病毒载量中位数为3.5log]。对Fibrotest(FT)、Hepascore(HS)、Fibrometer(FM)、SHASTA、APRI、Forns指数和Fib-4进行检测,以区分轻度至中度纤维化(F2)患者和重度纤维化(F3)患者。将受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和分类正确的患者比例与肝活检结果进行比较。

结果

FT、HS和FM能够对所有患者的肝纤维化进行分期,诊断F2时的AUROC分别为0.78、0.84和0.89。相关系数指数分别为0.37、0.46和0.48。分类正确的患者比例分别为62%、68%和71%。Fib-4、APRI和Forns指数仅能对37%-61% 的患者进行分期,且准确性较低。联合使用FT、HS和FM并未显著提高各项检测的性能。

结论

在HIV/HCV合并感染患者中用于预测显著肝纤维化时,Fibrometer、Hepascore和Fibrotest优于其他非侵入性肝纤维化生物标志物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验