• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于使用阿托西班或利托君对足月分娩进行急性宫缩抑制的前瞻性随机试验。

A prospective randomized trial of acute tocolysis in term labour with atosiban or ritodrine.

作者信息

de Heus Roel, Mulder Eduard J H, Derks Jan B, Kurver Piet H J, van Wolfswinkel Leo, Visser Gerard H A

机构信息

Department of Perinatology & Gynecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Aug;139(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.01.001
PMID:18316155
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of the tocolytics atosiban and ritodrine in term labour.

STUDY DESIGN

Women in term labour, requiring acute tocolysis, were prospectively randomized for treatment with either atosiban i.v. (n=70) or ritodrine i.v. (n=70). There were three indications for acute tocolysis: (1) fetal distress followed by continuation of labour, (2) fetal distress followed by emergency caesarean section (CS), and (3) arrest of contractions in women waiting for a secondary CS in the absence of fetal distress. Primary endpoints were maternal blood pressure (MBP) and maternal heart rate (MHR). Secondary endpoints were intra-uterine pressure, fetal heart rate (FHR), 5'-Apgar score and umbilical arterial pH.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics did not differ between the study groups. The ritodrine group showed a significant rise in MHR (p<0.001), MHR remained unaltered in the atosiban group (p=0.31). No significant changes occurred in systolic and diastolic BP in either group. FHR rose by a maximum of 11.6 bpm (8.5%) in the ritodrine group (p<0.001) compared to a rise of 4.9 bpm (4.8%) in the atosiban group (p=0.27). No differences were found in blood loss and fetal outcome. Compared to baseline, uterine pressure was reduced by a maximum of 55% (p<0.001) after ritodrine administration, compared to a maximal reduction of 54% (p<0.001) after atosiban administration. These effects did not differ between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Considering the maternal effects, our results suggest a possible role for atosiban bolus in acute tocolysis in term labour.

摘要

目的

研究宫缩抑制剂阿托西班和利托君在足月分娩中的作用。

研究设计

对需要紧急抑制宫缩的足月分娩妇女进行前瞻性随机分组,分别静脉注射阿托西班(n = 70)或利托君(n = 70)。紧急抑制宫缩有三个指征:(1)胎儿窘迫后继续分娩;(2)胎儿窘迫后行急诊剖宫产;(3)在无胎儿窘迫的情况下,等待二次剖宫产的妇女宫缩停止。主要终点指标为产妇血压(MBP)和产妇心率(MHR)。次要终点指标为子宫内压、胎儿心率(FHR)、5分钟阿氏评分和脐动脉pH值。

结果

研究组间基线特征无差异。利托君组MHR显著升高(p<0.001),阿托西班组MHR无变化(p = 0.31)。两组收缩压和舒张压均无显著变化。利托君组FHR最多升高11.6次/分(8.5%)(p<0.001),阿托西班组升高4.9次/分(4.8%)(p = 0.27)。两组在失血量和胎儿结局方面未发现差异。与基线相比,注射利托君后宫内压最大降低55%(p<0.001),注射阿托西班后宫内压最大降低54%(p<0.001)。两种治疗组之间的这些效果无差异。

结论

考虑到对产妇的影响,我们的结果表明阿托西班推注在足月分娩急性抑制宫缩中可能有作用。

相似文献

1
A prospective randomized trial of acute tocolysis in term labour with atosiban or ritodrine.一项关于使用阿托西班或利托君对足月分娩进行急性宫缩抑制的前瞻性随机试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Aug;139(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
2
Multicentre, parallel group, randomised, single-blind study of the safety and efficacy of atosiban versus ritodrine in the treatment of acute preterm labour in Korean women.阿托西班与利托君治疗韩国女性急性早产安全性和有效性的多中心、平行组、随机、单盲研究
BJOG. 2006 Nov;113(11):1228-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01053.x. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
3
Computerized evaluation of fetal heart rate during tocolytic treatment: comparison between atosiban and ritodrine.宫缩抑制剂治疗期间胎儿心率的计算机化评估:阿托西班与利托君的比较
Am J Perinatol. 2009 Apr;26(4):259-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103153. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
4
The effects of the tocolytics atosiban and nifedipine on fetal movements, heart rate and blood flow.宫缩抑制剂阿托西班和硝苯地平对胎动、心率及血流的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Jun;22(6):485-90. doi: 10.1080/14767050802702349.
5
The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version.阿托西班和利托君在外部胎位倒转术中的应用。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(8):927-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340701343123.
6
Effectiveness and safety of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban versus beta-adrenergic agonists in the treatment of preterm labour. The Worldwide Atosiban versus Beta-agonists Study Group.催产素拮抗剂阿托西班与β-肾上腺素能激动剂治疗早产的有效性和安全性。全球阿托西班与β-激动剂研究组。
BJOG. 2001 Feb;108(2):133-42.
7
Atosiban vs ritodrine used prophylactically with cerclage in ICSI pregnancies to prevent pre-term birth in women identified as being at high risk on the basis of transvaginal ultrasound scan.在经阴道超声扫描确定为高危的接受卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)妊娠的妇女中,使用阿托西班与利托君预防性联合宫颈环扎术以预防早产。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Jul;26(5):396-401. doi: 10.1080/01443610600719883.
8
Clinical practice evaluation of combination of atosiban, ritodrine and ketoprofen for inhibiting preterm labor.阿托西班、利托君和酮洛芬联合用于抑制早产的临床实践评估
Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Oct;59(5):481-9.
9
Acute tocolysis for uterine activity reduction in term labor: a review.足月分娩时降低子宫活动的急性宫缩抑制治疗:综述
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008 Jun;63(6):383-8; quiz 405. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31816ff75b.
10
Tocolysis with atosiban: experience in the management of premature labor before 24 weeks of pregnancy.阿托西班用于保胎治疗:妊娠24周前早产管理的经验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;272(1):26-30. doi: 10.1007/s00404-004-0652-8. Epub 2004 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute tocolysis for uterine tachysystole or suspected fetal distress.针对子宫收缩过速或疑似胎儿窘迫的急性宫缩抑制。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 4;7(7):CD009770. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009770.pub2.
2
Is an episode of suspected preterm labor that subsequently leads to a term delivery benign?一次疑似早产但随后足月分娩的情况是良性的吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;216(2):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.030.
3
Oxytocin receptor antagonists for inhibiting preterm labour.用于抑制早产的催产素受体拮抗剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 6;2014(6):CD004452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004452.pub3.