Hammond P, Forster-Gibson C, Chudley A E, Allanson J E, Hutton T J, Farrell S A, McKenzie J, Holden J J A, Lewis M E S
Eastman Dental Institute, UCL, London, UK.
Mol Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;13(6):614-23. doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.18. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
The heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) confounds attempts to identify causes and pathogenesis. Identifiable endophenotypes and reliable biomarkers within ASDs would help to focus molecular research and uncover genetic causes and developmental mechanisms. We used dense surface-modelling techniques to compare the facial morphology of 72 boys with ASD and 128 first-degree relatives to that of 254 unrelated controls. Pattern-matching algorithms were able to discriminate between the faces of ASD boys and those of matched controls (AUC=0.82) and also discriminate between the faces of unaffected mothers of ASD children and matched female controls (AUC=0.76). We detected significant facial asymmetry in boys with ASD (P<0.01), notably depth-wise in the supra- and periorbital regions anterior to the frontal pole of the right hemisphere of the brain. Unaffected mothers of children with ASD display similar significant facial asymmetry, more exaggerated than that in matched controls (P<0.03) and, in particular, show vertical asymmetry of the periorbital region. Unaffected fathers of children with ASD did not show facial asymmetry to a significant degree compared to controls. Two thirds of unaffected male siblings tested were classified unseen as more facially similar to unrelated boys with ASD than to unrelated controls. These unaffected male siblings and two small groups of girls with ASD and female siblings, all show overall directional asymmetry, but without achieving statistical significance in two-tailed t-tests of individual asymmetry of ASD family and matched control groups. We conclude that previously identified right dominant asymmetry of the frontal poles of boys with ASD could explain their facial asymmetry through the direct effect of brain growth. The atypical facial asymmetry of unaffected mothers of children with ASD requires further brain studies before the same explanation can be proposed. An alternative explanation, not mutually exclusive, is a simultaneous and parallel action on face and brain growth by genetic factors. Both possibilities suggest the need for coordinated face and brain studies on ASD probands and their first-degree relatives, especially on unaffected mothers, given that their unusual facial asymmetry suggests an ASD susceptibility arising from maternal genes.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的异质性使得确定病因和发病机制的尝试变得复杂。ASD中可识别的内表型和可靠的生物标志物将有助于聚焦分子研究,并揭示遗传病因和发育机制。我们使用密集表面建模技术,将72名患有ASD的男孩及其128名一级亲属的面部形态与254名无关对照者的面部形态进行比较。模式匹配算法能够区分患有ASD的男孩和匹配对照者的面部(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.82),也能区分ASD儿童未受影响的母亲和匹配的女性对照者的面部(AUC=0.76)。我们检测到患有ASD的男孩存在明显的面部不对称(P<0.01),特别是在大脑右半球额极前方的眶上和眶周区域的深度方向上。ASD儿童未受影响的母亲表现出类似的明显面部不对称,比匹配对照者更为明显(P<0.03),尤其是眶周区域的垂直不对称。与对照者相比,ASD儿童未受影响的父亲未表现出显著的面部不对称。三分之二接受测试的未受影响男性同胞在不知情的情况下被分类为,与无关的患有ASD的男孩相比,他们在面部上与无关对照者更相似。这些未受影响的男性同胞以及两组小样本的患有ASD的女孩和女性同胞,均表现出整体的方向性不对称,但在ASD家族和匹配对照组个体不对称的双尾t检验中未达到统计学显著性。我们得出结论,先前确定的患有ASD的男孩额极右侧优势不对称可能通过大脑生长的直接作用来解释他们的面部不对称。在提出相同解释之前,ASD儿童未受影响的母亲的非典型面部不对称需要进一步的脑部研究。另一种并非相互排斥的解释是,遗传因素对面部和大脑生长同时产生平行作用。这两种可能性都表明,需要对ASD先证者及其一级亲属,特别是未受影响的母亲,进行面部和脑部的协同研究,因为她们不寻常的面部不对称表明存在源自母系基因的ASD易感性。