Pier G B, Grout M, Desjardins D
Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
J Immunol. 1991 Sep 15;147(6):1869-76.
The failure of cystic fibrosis patients to limit chronic infection due to mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa might be due to ineffective opsonins produced against this bacterium. Nonopsonizing antibody to the bacterial capsule, mucoid exopolysaccharide (MEP), appears at elevated titers during chronic colonization of cystic fibrosis patients, as do opsonins not specific for MEP. Nonopsonic antibodies to MEP occur naturally in most adults and can be induced in animals by immunization. A limited number of humans produce MEP-specific opsonic antibodies after immunization. The purpose of this study was to compare the activation and deposition of C components onto the bacterial surface in the presence of these different antibodies. Opsonic killing uses the classical C pathway. MEP-specific opsonic and nonopsonic antibodies bound to whole bacteria and activated C to a comparable degree, but opsonic antibody deposited 3 to 40 times more C3 onto bacteria, mostly as C3bi, compared to nonopsonic antibody. In addition, two to three times as much nonopsonic mAb as opsonic mAb (both IgG2b) bound to the bacteria at comparable input concentrations, indicating the difference in C deposition was not due to differences in antibody binding. Non-MEP-specific opsonins also bound C3 to the bacteria, but only a mean of 27 +/- 14% was ester linked, compared with 81 +/- 11% of C3 deposited by MEP-specific opsonins. Immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that two-thirds of the C3 bound in the presence of MEP-specific opsonins was linked to MEP, whereas non-MEP-specific opsonins obtained from infected patients deposited the C3 onto LPS and other unidentified Ag. These data show that MEP-specific opsonins function by depositing C3 onto the outer bacterial surface that differentiates them from non-MEP-specific opsonins produced in response to chronic infection.
囊性纤维化患者无法限制由黏液型铜绿假单胞菌引起的慢性感染,可能是由于针对该细菌产生的调理素无效。针对细菌荚膜(黏液样胞外多糖,MEP)的非调理抗体在囊性纤维化患者慢性定植期间滴度升高,对MEP无特异性的调理素也是如此。大多数成年人天然存在针对MEP的非调理抗体,并且可通过免疫在动物中诱导产生。少数人在免疫后会产生MEP特异性调理抗体。本研究的目的是比较在这些不同抗体存在的情况下C成分在细菌表面的激活和沉积情况。调理杀伤作用通过经典C途径发挥。MEP特异性调理抗体和非调理抗体与完整细菌结合并在相当程度上激活C,但与非调理抗体相比,调理抗体在细菌上沉积的C3多3至40倍,主要为C3bi。此外,在相当的输入浓度下,与调理单克隆抗体(均为IgG2b)相比,结合到细菌上的非调理单克隆抗体量是调理单克隆抗体的两到三倍,这表明C沉积的差异不是由于抗体结合的差异。非MEP特异性调理素也将C3结合到细菌上,但只有平均27±14%是酯连接的,而MEP特异性调理素沉积的C3有81±11%是酯连接的。免疫沉淀实验表明,在MEP特异性调理素存在的情况下结合的C3中有三分之二与MEP相连,而从感染患者获得的非MEP特异性调理素将C沉积到LPS和其他未鉴定的抗原上。这些数据表明,MEP特异性调理素通过将C3沉积到细菌外表面发挥作用,这使其与因慢性感染产生的非MEP特异性调理素有所不同。