Moulds Michelle L, Kandris Eva, Williams Alishia D, Lang Tamara, Yap Carol, Hoffmeister Karolin
School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, NSW 2052 Australia.
Behav Ther. 2008 Mar;39(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
Teasdale's (Teasdale, J.D. (1988). Cognitive vulnerability to persistent depression. Cognition and Emotion, 2, 247-274) differential activation hypothesis refers to the ease with which maladaptive cognitive processes are triggered by mild dysphoria as cognitive reactivity. Supporting this model is evidence of a differential association between sad mood and dysfunctional cognitions in formerly depressed and never-depressed individuals and the finding that cognitive reactivity predicts depression recurrence in remitted depressives. The Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity-Revised (LEIDS-R; Van der Does, A.J.W., Williams, J.M.G. (2003). Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity-Revised (LEIDS-R). Retrieved September 4, 2007, from http://www.dousa.nl/publications_depression.htm#LEIDS) is a recently developed self-report measure that provides clinicians and researchers with a time-efficient means by which to assess cognitive reactivity. This study investigated the relationship between cognitive reactivity (indexed by the LEIDS-R) and depressive rumination in a nonclinical sample (N=324). As predicted, partial correlations between the LEIDS-R (subscale and Total scores) and the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS; Nolen-Hoeksema, S., and Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 115-121) were significant after controlling for current depressive symptoms. A subsample of participants (n=130) was administered a structured interview to determine current and past depression diagnostic status. Recovered depressed individuals scored more highly on the LEIDS-R Total and LEIDS-R Rumination subscale; however, the groups did not differ on the remaining subscales. Regression analyses indicated that (across all participants) LEIDS-R Total made a unique contribution to the prediction of depression over and above trait level of depressive rumination. Overall, the LEIDS-R is a time-efficient self-report index of cognitive reactivity that demonstrates promise in distinguishing recovered and never-depressed individuals.
蒂斯代尔(Teasdale, J.D.(1988年)。对持续性抑郁的认知易感性。《认知与情感》,2,247 - 274)的差异激活假说指的是,轻度烦躁情绪触发适应不良认知过程的难易程度,即认知反应性。支持该模型的证据包括,在既往抑郁和从未抑郁的个体中,悲伤情绪与功能失调认知之间存在差异关联,以及认知反应性可预测缓解期抑郁症患者的抑郁复发这一发现。莱顿抑郁敏感性修订指数(LEIDS - R;范德多斯,A.J.W.,威廉姆斯,J.M.G.(2003年)。莱顿抑郁敏感性修订指数(LEIDS - R)。2007年9月4日检索,来自http://www.dousa.nl/publications_depression.htm#LEIDS)是最近开发的一种自我报告测量工具,为临床医生和研究人员提供了一种评估认知反应性的高效方法。本研究在一个非临床样本(N = 324)中调查了认知反应性(以LEIDS - R为指标)与抑郁沉思之间的关系。如预期的那样,在控制当前抑郁症状后,LEIDS - R(分量表和总分)与沉思反应量表(RRS;诺伦 - 霍克西玛,S. 和莫罗,J.(1991年)。自然灾害后抑郁和创伤后应激症状的前瞻性研究:1989年洛马普列塔地震。《人格与社会心理学杂志》,61,115 - 121)之间的偏相关显著。对一部分参与者(n = 130)进行了结构化访谈,以确定当前和过去的抑郁诊断状况。康复的抑郁症患者在LEIDS - R总分和LEIDS - R沉思分量表上得分更高;然而,在其余分量表上两组没有差异。回归分析表明(在所有参与者中),LEIDS - R总分在预测抑郁方面,除了抑郁沉思的特质水平外,做出了独特贡献。总体而言,LEIDS - R是一种高效的认知反应性自我报告指数,在区分康复个体和从未抑郁个体方面显示出前景。