Suppr超能文献

对重性抑郁障碍缓解患者悲伤情绪的认知反应的测量。

The measurement of cognitive reactivity to sad mood in patients remitted from major depressive disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Program for Mood Disorders, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Psychol. 2018 Sep;57(3):313-327. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12175. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cognitive reactivity (CR) to sad mood is a risk factor for major depressive disorder (MDD). CR is usually measured by assessing change on the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS-change) after sad mood-induction. It has, however, been suggested that the versions of the DAS (A/B) are not interchangeable, impacting the reliability and validity of the change score. The Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity-Revised (LEIDS-R) is an alternative self-report measure of CR. Studies examining the relationship between LEIDS-R and DAS-change have shown mixed results. We examined whether scores of these CR measures differed between remitted MDD and controls, the relationship between these CR measures, and the effect of order of DAS administration on DAS-change.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional design with two groups (remitted MDD and controls).

METHODS

Sixty-eight MDD patients remitted from ≥2 previous episodes, not taking antidepressants, and 43 never-depressed controls participated in a mood-induction and filled in the DAS-A/B in randomized order before and after mood-induction, and LEIDS-R separately.

RESULTS

LEIDS-R scores and pre-mood-induction DAS scores were significantly higher in remitted MDD than controls (p < .001, Cohen's d = 1.48; p = .001, Cohen's d = 0.66, respectively). DAS-change did not differ between these groups (p = .67, Cohen's d = 0.08). LEIDS-R correlated with DAS-change (r = .30, p = .042), but only in the group that filled in DAS-B before DAS-A. In remitted MDD, DAS-change was dependent on the order of DAS versions before and after mood-induction (10.6 ± 19.0 vs. -1.2 ± 10.5, for order B-A and A-B, respectively), with a significant group × order interaction (p = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

Existing DAS versions are not interchangeable, which compromises the usefulness of mood-inductions in clinical practice. The LEIDS-R seems a valid measure of cognitive vulnerability to depression.

PRACTITIONER POINTS

Clinical implications: Cognitive reactivity (CR) is a risk factor of depressive recurrence. The current measurement of CR, by assessing change on the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS) after mood-induction, is not reliable. The Leiden Index Depression Sensitivity-Revised (LEIDS-R) is an alternative CR measure. In contrast to mood-induction, it reliably assesses depression vulnerability. The use of mood-inductions for clinical/research purposes is unnecessary.

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

We were not able to examine the effect of previous treatment, which could have affected results as psychological treatments probably have differential effects on CR. Examining un-medicated patients may have led to selection of a sample not completely representative for the general MDD population. We did not administer both parallel versions of the DAS (A/B) before and after mood-induction. This might have provided better understanding of their differential sensitivity to change.

摘要

目的

对悲伤情绪的认知反应(CR)是重性抑郁障碍(MDD)的一个风险因素。CR 通常通过在悲伤情绪诱导后评估功能失调态度量表(DAS-change)的变化来衡量。然而,有人认为 DAS 的版本(A/B)不能互换,这会影响变化分数的可靠性和有效性。莱顿抑郁敏感修订版(LEIDS-R)是一种替代的 CR 自我报告测量方法。研究表明,LEIDS-R 和 DAS-change 之间的关系结果不一。我们检查了这些 CR 测量方法在缓解的 MDD 患者和对照组之间的评分是否存在差异,这些 CR 测量方法之间的关系,以及 DAS 给药顺序对 DAS-change 的影响。

设计

具有两组(缓解的 MDD 和对照组)的横断面设计。

方法

68 名 MDD 患者从≥2 次发作中缓解,未服用抗抑郁药,43 名从未抑郁过的对照组参加了情绪诱导,并在情绪诱导前后随机顺序填写了 DAS-A/B 和 LEIDS-R。

结果

缓解的 MDD 患者的 LEIDS-R 评分和预情绪诱导的 DAS 评分明显高于对照组(p<0.001,Cohen's d=1.48;p=0.001,Cohen's d=0.66,分别)。这些组之间的 DAS-change 没有差异(p=0.67,Cohen's d=0.08)。LEIDS-R 与 DAS-change 相关(r=0.30,p=0.042),但仅在填写 DAS-B 之前的 DAS-A 的组中。在缓解的 MDD 中,DAS-change 取决于情绪诱导前后 DAS 版本的顺序(10.6±19.0 与-1.2±10.5,分别为 B-A 和 A-B 顺序),且具有显著的组×顺序交互作用(p=0.012)。

结论

现有的 DAS 版本不可互换,这影响了情绪诱导在临床实践中的有用性。LEIDS-R 似乎是一种评估抑郁易感性的有效方法。

从业者要点

临床意义:认知反应(CR)是抑郁复发的一个风险因素。目前通过在情绪诱导后评估功能失调态度量表(DAS)的变化来衡量 CR,是不可靠的。莱顿抑郁敏感修订版(LEIDS-R)是一种替代的 CR 测量方法。与情绪诱导不同,它可靠地评估了抑郁易感性。为临床/研究目的使用情绪诱导是不必要的。

研究的局限性

我们无法检查以前治疗的效果,因为心理治疗可能对 CR 有不同的影响,这可能会影响结果。检查未服用药物的患者可能会导致选择不完全代表一般 MDD 人群的样本。我们没有在情绪诱导前后同时使用 DAS 的两个平行版本(A/B)。这可能会更好地了解它们对变化的敏感性差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/360c/6099317/eaefff9616db/BJC-57-313-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验