Suppr超能文献

青少年的创伤后反应:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的标准与经历创伤的青少年的现实生活体验契合程度如何?

Post-traumatic reactions in adolescents: how well do the DSM-IV PTSD criteria fit the real life experience of trauma exposed youth?

作者信息

Saul Andrea L, Grant Kathryn E, Carter Jocelyn Smith

机构信息

Department of Psychology, DePaul University, 2219 N. Kenmore Ave., Chicago, IL 60614, USA.

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 Aug;36(6):915-25. doi: 10.1007/s10802-008-9222-z. Epub 2008 Mar 11.

Abstract

This study examined the structure and symptom specific patterns of post traumatic distress in a sample of 1,581 adolescents who reported exposure to at least one traumatic event. Symptom reporting patterns are consistent with past literature in that females reported more symptoms than males and older youth reported more symptoms than did their younger peers. Young people reporting exposure to exclusively violent type traumas were also found to be more likely to endorse symptoms than peers exposed exclusively to non violent type traumas. Confirmatory factor analysis provided stronger support for a four-factor model of PTSD than either the DSM-IV model or an alternate model. Further examination of the four factor model revealed gender differences in factor loadings with small to moderate effect sizes for recurrent, distressing memories, flashbacks, restricted affect, difficulty remember details, detachment, limited future orientation, hypervigilance and startle symptoms. Differences in factor loadings with the four factor model were also noted between younger and older adolescents, with medium to large effect sizes on the arousal items. In contract, comparison of the factor loadings revealed only small differences between youth exposed exclusively to violent traumatic stressors and those exposed exclusively to non violent traumatic stressors, suggesting relative similarity between these two groups.

摘要

本研究调查了1581名报告至少经历过一次创伤事件的青少年样本中创伤后应激障碍的结构和症状特定模式。症状报告模式与过去的文献一致,即女性报告的症状比男性多,年龄较大的青少年报告的症状比年龄较小的同龄人多。还发现,报告仅经历暴力型创伤的年轻人比仅经历非暴力型创伤的同龄人更有可能认可相关症状。验证性因素分析为创伤后应激障碍的四因素模型提供了比《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版模型或替代模型更强有力的支持。对四因素模型的进一步研究揭示了因素负荷方面的性别差异,对于反复出现的痛苦记忆、闪回、情感受限、难以记住细节、分离、未来取向有限、过度警觉和惊吓症状,效应大小为小到中等。在年龄较小和较大的青少年之间也注意到四因素模型在因素负荷上的差异,在唤醒项目上效应大小为中到大型。相比之下,因素负荷的比较显示,仅经历暴力创伤应激源的年轻人和仅经历非暴力创伤应激源的年轻人之间只有微小差异,这表明这两组相对相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验