Harrold Leslie R, Andrade Susan E
Meyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Fallon Clinic Foundation, and Fallon Community Health Plan, Worcester, MA, USA.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Apr;38(5):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
Nonadherence with medication treatment has been found to occur in large proportions of patients with a broad range of chronic conditions. Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the literature examining adherence with treatments for inflammatory rheumatic conditions to assess the magnitude of the problem in this patient population.
A MEDLINE search of English language literature was performed to identify studies published between January 1, 1985 and November 30, 2007 that evaluated adherence with chronic medications needed in the treatment of rheumatic conditions.
A total of 20 articles met the criteria for evaluation, the majority of which focused on the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Most of the studies examined the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Adherence was assessed based on self-report, pill counts, pharmacy dispensings, openings of pill containers using electronic devices, laboratory assays, and physician assessment. Adherence varied greatly based on the adherence measure used, arthritic condition evaluated, and medication under study. Overall, the highest rates of adherence were based on self-reports for a wide variety of medications and conditions (range of persons reporting adherence was 30 to 99%), while the lowest adherence rates were for allopurinol based on pharmacy dispensings (18-26%).
Adherence has not been widely examined for most chronic inflammatory rheumatic conditions and the few studies that exist used different definitions and populations, thus limiting any conclusions. However, the current literature does suggest that nonadherence is a substantial problem.
在患有多种慢性病的患者中,发现很大比例的人不坚持药物治疗。我们的目的是对有关炎症性风湿性疾病治疗依从性的文献进行系统综述,以评估该患者群体中这一问题的严重程度。
对MEDLINE数据库中1985年1月1日至2007年11月30日发表的英文文献进行检索,以确定评估风湿性疾病治疗所需慢性药物依从性的研究。
共有20篇文章符合评估标准,其中大多数关注类风湿关节炎的治疗。大多数研究考察了非甾体抗炎药和改善病情抗风湿药的使用情况。依从性是根据自我报告、药丸计数、药房配药情况、使用电子设备打开药瓶的情况、实验室检测以及医生评估来评估的。依从性因所使用的依从性测量方法、所评估的关节炎病情以及所研究的药物而有很大差异。总体而言,对于多种药物和病情,基于自我报告的依从率最高(报告依从的人群比例范围为30%至99%),而基于药房配药情况的别嘌醇依从率最低(18% - 26%)。
对于大多数慢性炎症性风湿性疾病,依从性尚未得到广泛研究,现有的少数研究使用了不同的定义和人群,因此限制了任何结论的得出。然而,当前文献确实表明不依从是一个严重问题。