Suppr超能文献

颈部功能障碍指数:可靠性与有效性研究

The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.

作者信息

Vernon H, Mior S

机构信息

Division of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991 Sep;14(7):409-15.

PMID:1834753
Abstract

Injuries to the cervical spine, especially those involving the soft tissues, represent a significant source of chronic disability. Methods of assessment for such disability, especially those targeted at activities of daily living which are most affected by neck pain, are few in number. A modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Index was conducted producing a 10-item scaled questionnaire entitled the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Face validity was ensured through peer-review and patient feedback sessions. Test-retest reliability was conducted on an initial sample of 17 consecutive "whiplash"-injured patients in an outpatient clinic, resulting in good statistical significance (Pearson's r = 0.89, p less than or equal to .05). The alpha coefficients were calculated from a pool of questionnaires completed by 52 such subjects resulting in a total index alpha of 0.80, with all items having individual alpha scores above 0.75. Concurrent validity was assessed in two ways. First, on a smaller subset of 10 patients who completed a course of conservative care, the percentage of change on NDI scores before and after treatment was compared to visual analogue scale scores of percent of perceived improvement in activity levels. These scores correlated at 0.60. Secondly, in a larger subset of 30 subjects, NDI scores were compared to scores on the McGill Pain Questionnaire, with similar moderately high correlations (0.69-0.70). While the sample size of some of the analyses is somewhat small, this study demonstrated that the NDI achieved a high degree of reliability and internal consistency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

颈椎损伤,尤其是涉及软组织的损伤,是导致慢性残疾的一个重要原因。针对此类残疾的评估方法很少,特别是针对那些受颈部疼痛影响最大的日常生活活动的评估方法。对奥斯威斯瑞腰痛指数进行了修改,编制了一份名为颈部残疾指数(NDI)的10项量表问卷。通过同行评审和患者反馈会议确保了表面效度。对一家门诊连续17名“挥鞭样”损伤患者的初始样本进行了重测信度检验,结果具有良好的统计学意义(皮尔逊r = 0.89,p≤0.05)。从52名此类受试者填写的一组问卷中计算出α系数,总指数α为0.80,所有项目的个体α分数均高于0.75。同时效度通过两种方式进行评估。首先,在完成保守治疗疗程的10名患者的较小子集中,将治疗前后NDI评分的变化百分比与活动水平感知改善百分比的视觉模拟量表评分进行比较。这些评分的相关性为0.60。其次,在30名受试者的较大子集中,将NDI评分与麦吉尔疼痛问卷的评分进行比较,相关性同样中等偏高(0.69 - 0.70)。虽然部分分析的样本量有些小,但本研究表明NDI具有高度的可靠性和内部一致性。(摘要截短于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验