• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维度之间以及维度内部特征的搜索、相似性和整合。

Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions.

作者信息

Treisman A

机构信息

University of California, Berkeley.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Aug;17(3):652-76. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.3.652.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.17.3.652
PMID:1834783
Abstract

Three experiments test the claim that conjunction search is difficult only because the target resembles each distractor, whereas the distractors are highly discriminable from each other. The results show that when similarity is controlled, there is an additional difficulty created by the need to conjoin features. In addition, a target with standard values (blue and vertical) is found more easily than targets with nonstandard values (e.g., violet and tilted). Similarity may result in shared components in the functional codes that represent the targets and the distractors. A hypothesis that is based on coarse coding of features values relates the difficulty of feature search with nonstandard targets to problems in coding conjunctions of features within dimensions. Consistent with this account, illusory targets are reported not only in the usual conjunction displays but also in displays containing different features that may share the same underlying components.

摘要

三项实验检验了这样一种说法,即联合搜索困难仅仅是因为目标与每个干扰项相似,而干扰项之间则具有高度可区分性。结果表明,当相似度得到控制时,特征联合的需求会带来额外的困难。此外,具有标准值(蓝色和垂直)的目标比具有非标准值(例如,紫色和倾斜)的目标更容易被找到。相似度可能会导致在表示目标和干扰项的功能代码中出现共享组件。一个基于特征值粗略编码的假设将非标准目标的特征搜索困难与维度内特征联合编码中的问题联系起来。与此观点一致的是,不仅在通常的联合显示中会报告虚幻目标,在包含可能共享相同潜在组件的不同特征的显示中也会报告虚幻目标。

相似文献

1
Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions.维度之间以及维度内部特征的搜索、相似性和整合。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Aug;17(3):652-76. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.3.652.
2
Conjunction search revisited.重新审视联合搜索。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Aug;16(3):459-78. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.3.459.
3
Discriminability and dimensionality effects in visual search for featural conjunctions: a functional pop-out.视觉搜索特征联结中的可辨别性和维度效应:一种功能性凸显。
Percept Psychophys. 1989 Jul;46(1):72-80. doi: 10.3758/bf03208076.
4
Visual feature integration and focused attention: response competition from multiple distractor features.视觉特征整合与集中注意力:来自多个干扰特征的反应竞争。
Percept Psychophys. 1997 May;59(4):543-56. doi: 10.3758/bf03211863.
5
Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions.特征相似性对错觉性结合的影响。
Percept Psychophys. 1991 Feb;49(2):105-16. doi: 10.3758/bf03205032.
6
Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration.联合搜索中的密度效应:特征整合的粗略定位机制的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Nov;17(4):891-901. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.4.891.
7
Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search.联合搜索中刺激特征的激活与抑制
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):294-300. doi: 10.3758/bf03196164.
8
Heterogeneity effects in visual search predicted from the group scanning model.基于群体扫描模型预测的视觉搜索中的异质性效应。
Can J Exp Psychol. 1994 Dec;48(4):495-515. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.48.4.495.
9
Attentional selection of objects or features: evidence from a modified search task.对象或特征的注意选择:来自改进搜索任务的证据。
Percept Psychophys. 1999 Feb;61(2):322-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03206891.
10
Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features.视觉搜索不对称性:刺激熟悉度和低层次特征的影响
Percept Psychophys. 2001 Apr;63(3):464-75. doi: 10.3758/bf03194413.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual-Spatial Search in Neglect Syndrome as a Function of the Number of Stimuli in the Hemifields.忽视综合征中的视觉空间搜索与半视野中刺激数量的关系
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;12(23):2387. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232387.
2
A limited visual search advantage for illusory faces.对虚假面孔的有限视觉搜索优势。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):717-730. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02833-y. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Searching for a tactile target: the impact of set-size on the N140cc.寻找触觉目标:刺激集大小对N140cc的影响
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jun 22;17:1209555. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1209555. eCollection 2023.
4
Weighting the factors affecting attention guidance during free viewing and visual search: The unexpected role of object recognition uncertainty.权衡自由观看和视觉搜索过程中影响注意力引导的因素:物体识别不确定性的意外作用。
J Vis. 2022 Mar 2;22(4):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.4.13.
5
Intermediate, Wholistic Shape Representation in Object Recognition: A Pre-Attentive Stage of Processing?物体识别中的中级整体形状表示:一个前注意加工阶段?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Dec 23;15:761174. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.761174. eCollection 2021.
6
From "satisfaction of search" to "subsequent search misses": a review of multiple-target search errors across radiology and cognitive science.从“搜索满足”到“后续搜索遗漏”:放射学和认知科学中多目标搜索错误的综述。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Aug 28;6(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00318-w.
7
What do radiologists look for? Advances and limitations of perceptual learning in radiologic search.放射科医生在寻找什么?放射科搜索中感知学习的进展和局限性。
J Vis. 2020 Oct 1;20(10):17. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.10.17.
8
Does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory?数字相似性是否会改变工作记忆中与年龄相关的分心?
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 4;14(9):e0222027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222027. eCollection 2019.
9
Response-level processing during visual feature search: Effects of frontoparietal activation and adult age.视觉特征搜索过程中的反应水平加工:额顶叶激活与成年人年龄的影响
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):330-349. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01823-3.
10
Medium versus difficult visual search: How a quantitative change in the functional visual field leads to a qualitative difference in performance.中等难度与高难度视觉搜索:功能性视野的定量变化如何导致表现上的定性差异。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):118-139. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01787-4.