• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the critically ill: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Cook D J, Witt L G, Cook R J, Guyatt G H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1991 Nov;91(5):519-27. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90189-5.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(91)90189-5
PMID:1835294
Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the differential effect of stress ulcer prophylaxis on overt bleeding, clinically important bleeding, and mortality in critically ill patients.

DATA IDENTIFICATION

Computerized bibliographic search of published and unpublished research.

STUDY SELECTION

Independent review of 168 articles identified 42 relevant randomized trials for inclusion.

DATA ABSTRACTION

The validity, population, intervention, and outcomes of each trial were evaluated.

RESULTS

Stress ulcer prophylaxis with antacids (odds ratio 0.40 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.79]) or histamine-2-receptor antagonists (odds ratio 0.29 [95% CI 0.17 to 0.45]) decreases the incidence of overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Histamine-2-receptor antagonists are more effective than antacids at reducing overt hemorrhage (odds ratio 0.56 [95% CI 0.33 to 0.97]). A significant reduction in clinically important gastrointestinal hemorrhage is evident only with histamine-2-receptor antagonist therapy. There is a trend favoring antacids over sucralfate in the outcome of clinically important bleeding (odds ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.16 to 2.49]); however, there are insufficient data to evaluate histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate. No difference in mortality between treated and untreated patients was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Overt gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients is reduced by prophylaxis with antacids or histamine-2-receptor antagonists. Histamine-2-receptor antagonists are more effective than antacids at decreasing overt bleeding and are more effective than no treatment at reducing the incidence of clinically important bleeding. Mortality rates in the intensive care unit are not decreased by stress ulcer prophylaxis.

摘要

相似文献

1
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the critically ill: a meta-analysis.
Am J Med. 1991 Nov;91(5):519-27. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90189-5.
2
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients. Resolving discordant meta-analyses.危重症患者应激性溃疡的预防。解决相互矛盾的荟萃分析。
JAMA. 1996;275(4):308-14.
3
Stress ulcer prophylaxis: gastrointestinal bleeding and nosocomial pneumonia. Best evidence synthesis.应激性溃疡预防:胃肠道出血与医院获得性肺炎。最佳证据综合分析
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1995;210:48-52. doi: 10.3109/00365529509090271.
4
Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamine 2 receptor antagonists in critically ill adults - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.重症成人患者使用质子泵抑制剂或组胺 2 受体拮抗剂预防应激性溃疡 - 随机对照试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1105-y.
5
Histamine-2-receptor antagonists and antacids in the critically ill population: stress ulceration versus nosocomial pneumonia.危重症人群中组胺-2受体拮抗剂与抗酸剂:应激性溃疡与医院获得性肺炎
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994 Jul;15(7):437-42. doi: 10.1086/646948.
6
Re-evaluating the Utility of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Critically Ill Patient: A Clinical Scenario-Based Meta-Analysis.重新评估危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的作用:基于临床情景的荟萃分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Mar;39(3):408-420. doi: 10.1002/phar.2172. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
7
Nosocomial pneumonia and the role of gastric pH. A meta-analysis.
Chest. 1991 Jul;100(1):7-13. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.1.7.
8
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the new millennium: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新千年的应激性溃疡预防:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2222-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f17adf.
9
Proton pump inhibitors versus histamine 2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂用于危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):693-705. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182758734.
10
Weighing risks and benefits of stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients.评估危重症患者应激性溃疡预防措施的风险与益处。
Crit Care. 2012 Oct 29;16(5):322. doi: 10.1186/cc11819.

引用本文的文献

1
Stress ulcer prophylaxis practice in UK critical care units: A comparison of cross-sectional surveys between 2020 and 2024.英国重症监护病房应激性溃疡预防措施的实践:2020年至2024年横断面调查的比较
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 May 26:17511437251338614. doi: 10.1177/17511437251338614.
2
Role of Proton Pump Inhibitor as Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Sick Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.质子泵抑制剂在患病儿童应激性溃疡预防中的作用:一项随机对照试验
Indian Pediatr. 2025 Jun;62(6):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s13312-025-00035-3. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
3
Mind the gut: Navigating the complex landscape of gastroprotection in neurosurgical patients.
关注肠道:应对神经外科患者胃保护的复杂情况
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 28;31(8):102959. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i8.102959.
4
Stress ulcer prophylaxis use in critical care units at public hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa.南非约翰内斯堡公立医院重症监护病房应激性溃疡预防措施的使用情况。
South Afr J Crit Care. 2021 Mar 17;37(1). doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i1.439. eCollection 2021.
5
Impact of pharmacy-supported interventions on proportion of patients receiving non-indicated acid suppressive therapy upon discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药学支持干预对出院时接受非指征性抑酸治疗患者比例的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243134. eCollection 2020.
6
The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance urography for detecting ureteric obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振尿路成像诊断输尿管梗阻的价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2020 Sep;52(6):275-282. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1741672. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
7
Incidence and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding among patients admitted to medical intensive care units.入住医疗重症监护病房患者胃肠道出血的发生率及危险因素
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;8(3):167-173. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2016-100722. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
8
Identifying Risk Factors Associated with Inappropriate Use of Acid Suppressive Therapy at a Community Hospital.识别社区医院不适当使用抑酸疗法的相关风险因素。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:1973086. doi: 10.1155/2016/1973086. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
9
Current Opinions on Stress-Related Mucosal Disease Prevention in Canadian Pediatric Intensive Care Units.加拿大儿科重症监护病房应激相关黏膜病预防的现状观点
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jul-Aug;20(4):299-308. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-20.4.299.
10
Prevalence and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding and use of acid suppressants in acutely ill adult intensive care patients.急性危重病成年重症监护患者的胃肠道出血发生率和结局以及抑酸剂的使用情况。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 May;41(5):833-45. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3725-1. Epub 2015 Apr 10.