• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[戒烟与吸烟流行率:性别、社会阶层和初级卫生保健]

[Quitting and prevalence of smoking: gender, social class, and primary health care].

作者信息

Villalbí Joan R, Daban Ferran, Pasarín M Isabel, Rodríguez-Sanz Maica, Borrell Carme

机构信息

Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2008 Feb;40(2):87-92. doi: 10.1157/13116155.

DOI:10.1157/13116155
PMID:18358162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7659765/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the joint role of social class and primary health care in giving up smoking.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain), 2000-2001.

PARTICIPANTS

A sample of the resident non-institutionalized population, restricted to people aged 15-50 who have a habitual primary care source (n=4178).

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

These were obtained from the Barcelona Health Interview Survey. Independent variables include sex, social class and usual source of primary health care. Dependent variables are having ever been a smoker, having quit, and being a current smoker. Age-adjusted proportions were calculated (95% CI).

RESULTS

Social class shows that more manual workers have been smokers. Men smoked more than women. Overall quitting is similar in both sexes. Quitting showed a social gradient in men. Measurement of source of care showed quitting was higher among users of private clinics, but CI overlapped. On stratifying the source of primary care by social class, an effect seemed to emerge for men, but the CI overlapped. Prevalence at the time of the survey was higher for men; a class gradient in current prevalence emerged for men, but was less visible for women, where CI overlapped.

CONCLUSIONS

Social class is a powerful determinant of smoking. Men in low-classed jobs are at greater risk of starting to smoke, are less likely to give up, and smoke more. The proportion of quitting seems lower in of public clinics users. Health advice is efficacious, but in population terms other factors seem to have greater influence.

摘要

目的

分析社会阶层和初级卫生保健在戒烟方面的共同作用。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

2000 - 2001年,巴塞罗那(西班牙加泰罗尼亚)。

参与者

常住非机构化人口样本,限于年龄在15 - 50岁且有固定初级保健机构的人群(n = 4178)。

主要测量指标

数据来自巴塞罗那健康访谈调查。自变量包括性别、社会阶层和初级卫生保健的常用机构。因变量为曾经吸烟、已戒烟和目前仍在吸烟。计算年龄调整比例(95%置信区间)。

结果

社会阶层显示,体力劳动者中吸烟的人更多。男性吸烟多于女性。总体戒烟情况在两性中相似。男性的戒烟情况呈现社会梯度。对保健机构的调查显示,私人诊所使用者的戒烟率较高,但置信区间有重叠。按社会阶层对初级保健机构进行分层时,男性似乎出现了一种效应,但置信区间有重叠。调查时男性的患病率较高;男性当前患病率存在阶层梯度,但女性不太明显,置信区间有重叠。

结论

社会阶层是吸烟的一个重要决定因素。从事低阶层工作的男性开始吸烟的风险更高,戒烟的可能性更小,且吸烟量更大。公立诊所使用者的戒烟比例似乎较低。健康建议是有效的,但从总体人群来看,其他因素似乎有更大影响。

相似文献

1
[Quitting and prevalence of smoking: gender, social class, and primary health care].[戒烟与吸烟流行率:性别、社会阶层和初级卫生保健]
Aten Primaria. 2008 Feb;40(2):87-92. doi: 10.1157/13116155.
2
[Changing epidemiology of smoking: Barcelona, 2000-2001].[吸烟流行病学的变化:巴塞罗那,2000 - 2001年]
Rev Clin Esp. 2004 Jun;204(6):312-6. doi: 10.1157/13062270.
3
[Changes in the population smoking patterns: Barcelona, 1983-2006].[人口吸烟模式的变化:巴塞罗那,1983 - 2006年]
Med Clin (Barc). 2009 Mar 28;132(11):414-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2008.09.031. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
4
Smoking and Quitting Behavior by Sexual Orientation: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Adults in England.吸烟和性取向与戒烟行为:英格兰成年人的横断面调查。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):124-134. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa042.
5
[The sociodemographic determinants of the tobacco habit and its cessation in the population of Cornellà de Llobregat].[洛布雷加特河畔科尔内利亚人口中吸烟习惯及其戒烟的社会人口学决定因素]
Gac Sanit. 1999 Mar-Apr;13(2):126-34. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(99)71337-3.
6
How does rate of smoking cessation vary by age, gender and social grade? Findings from a population survey in England.戒烟率如何因年龄、性别和社会阶层而异?来自英国一项人口调查的结果。
Addiction. 2013 Sep;108(9):1680-5. doi: 10.1111/add.12241. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
7
Prevalence and correlates of receipt by smokers of general practitioner advice on smoking cessation in England: a cross-sectional survey of adults.英格兰地区全科医生建议吸烟者戒烟的现状及其影响因素:一项针对成年人的横断面调查。
Addiction. 2021 Feb;116(2):358-372. doi: 10.1111/add.15187. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
8
[Determinants of quitting smoking in Catalonia, Spain].[西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区戒烟的决定因素]
Gac Sanit. 1999 Sep-Oct;13(5):353-60. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(99)71386-5.
9
Maternal smoking, social class and outcomes of pregnancy.孕妇吸烟、社会阶层与妊娠结局
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;21(5):441-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00845.x.
10
Smoking initiation and cessation by gender and educational level in Catalonia, Spain.西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区按性别和教育程度划分的吸烟起始与戒烟情况。
Prev Med. 2001 Mar;32(3):218-23. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0794.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic patterns of smoking cessation behavior in low and middle-income countries: Emerging evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Surveys and International Tobacco Control Surveys.中低收入国家戒烟行为的社会经济模式:来自全球成人烟草调查和国际烟草控制调查的新证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0220223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220223. eCollection 2019.
2
[Evolution of Smoking According to Social Class in the Adult Population of the Canary Islands During 2000-2015: Follow-up of the CDC-Canary Cohort].[2000 - 2015年加那利群岛成年人口吸烟情况按社会阶层的演变:疾病预防控制中心-加那利队列随访]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Jun-Jul;52(6):381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
3
Effectiveness of intensive group and individual interventions for smoking cessation in primary health care settings: a randomized trial.在基层医疗环境中,强化团体和个体干预措施对戒烟的效果:一项随机试验。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Feb 23;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-89.

本文引用的文献

1
[Evaluation of the primary health care reform: preventive practices and inequalities].[初级卫生保健改革评估:预防措施与不平等现象]
Aten Primaria. 2007 Jul;39(7):339-46. doi: 10.1157/13107718.
2
Reducing the burden of smoking world-wide: effectiveness of interventions and their coverage.减轻全球吸烟负担:干预措施的效果及其覆盖范围
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006 Nov;25(6):597-609. doi: 10.1080/09595230600944511.
3
Is some provider advice on smoking cessation better than no advice? An instrumental variable analysis of the 2001 National Health Interview Survey.某些关于戒烟的医疗建议是否比没有建议更好?对2001年国民健康访谈调查的一项工具变量分析。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec;41(6):2114-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00592.x.
4
Validity of self-reported smoking status among participants in a lung cancer screening trial.肺癌筛查试验参与者自我报告吸烟状况的有效性。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Oct;15(10):1825-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0393.
5
[Views, practices, barriers, and the will to change, when counselling to give up smoking is being given].[在进行戒烟咨询时的观点、做法、障碍以及改变的意愿]
Aten Primaria. 2005 Nov;36(8):434-41. doi: 10.1157/13081057.
6
NHS smoking cessation services and smoking prevalence: observational study.英国国民医疗服务体系戒烟服务与吸烟率:观察性研究
BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):760. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38407.755521.F7. Epub 2005 Mar 18.
7
[Veracity of smokers' reports of abstinence at smoking cessation clinics].
Arch Bronconeumol. 2005 Mar;41(3):135-40. doi: 10.1016/s1579-2129(06)60414-x.
8
How effective are the English smoking treatment services in reaching disadvantaged smokers?英国的吸烟治疗服务在帮助弱势吸烟者戒烟方面效果如何?
Addiction. 2005 Apr;100 Suppl 2:36-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01026.x.
9
Under-use of smoking-cessation treatments: results from the National Health Interview Survey, 2000.戒烟治疗的使用不足:2000年美国国家健康访谈调查的结果
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jan;28(1):119-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.007.
10
[Changing epidemiology of smoking: Barcelona, 2000-2001].[吸烟流行病学的变化:巴塞罗那,2000 - 2001年]
Rev Clin Esp. 2004 Jun;204(6):312-6. doi: 10.1157/13062270.