Centerbar David B, Schnall Simone, Clore Gerald L, Garvin Erika D
Center for Health Policy and Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA 01545, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Apr;94(4):560-78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.560.
In five studies, the authors examined the effects on cognitive performance of coherence and incoherence between conceptual and experiential sources of affective information. The studies crossed the priming of happy and sad concepts with affective experiences. In different experiments, these included approach or avoidance actions, happy or sad feelings, and happy or sad expressive behaviors. In all studies, coherence between affective concepts and affective experiences led to better recall of a story than did affective incoherence. The authors suggest that the experience of such experiential affective cues serves as evidence of the appropriateness of affective concepts that come to mind. The results suggest that affective coherence has epistemic benefits and that incoherence is costly in terms of cognitive performance.
在五项研究中,作者考察了情感信息的概念性来源与体验性来源之间的一致性和不一致性对认知表现的影响。这些研究将快乐和悲伤概念的启动与情感体验进行了交叉。在不同的实验中,这些体验包括趋近或回避行为、快乐或悲伤的情绪,以及快乐或悲伤的表达行为。在所有研究中,情感概念与情感体验之间的一致性比情感不一致性能带来更好的故事回忆效果。作者认为,这种体验性情感线索的体验可作为进入脑海的情感概念适宜性的证据。结果表明,情感一致性具有认知优势,而不一致性在认知表现方面代价高昂。