• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项多中心研究。

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter study.

作者信息

Frazee R C, Thames T, Appel M, Roberts J, Symmonds R, Snyder S, Hendricks J, Smith R, Allen T W

机构信息

Scott & White Clinic, Temple, TX.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991 Jun;1(3):157-9. doi: 10.1089/lps.1991.1.157.

DOI:10.1089/lps.1991.1.157
PMID:1836401
Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been developed as an alternative to open cholecystectomy for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. A collaborative study of 261 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at three Texas institutions was performed to determine the effectiveness and safety of this technique. There were 65 males and 196 females with a mean age of 49 years (range 17-94 years). Acute cholecystitis was present in 38 patients and chronic cholecystitis in 223 patients. Mean length of surgery was 80 minutes (20 min to 4 hr). Fifteen patients were converted to the open technique intraoperatively due to bleeding, adhesions, or difficulty of dissection. There were no perioperative deaths and morbidity was 3% including urinary retention, small bowel obstruction, arrhythmia, wound infection, and bile leakage. There were no common duct injuries. Hospitalization ranged from outpatient surgery to 7 postoperative days with a mean of 1.2 days. We conclude that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely and with low morbidity and offers shorter hospitalization and postoperative recovery.

摘要

腹腔镜胆囊切除术已被开发出来,作为治疗有症状胆结石的开腹胆囊切除术的替代方法。对德克萨斯州三个机构的261例接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行了一项合作研究,以确定该技术的有效性和安全性。其中男性65例,女性196例,平均年龄49岁(范围17 - 94岁)。38例患者患有急性胆囊炎,223例患者患有慢性胆囊炎。平均手术时间为80分钟(20分钟至4小时)。15例患者因出血、粘连或解剖困难而在术中转为开腹手术。围手术期无死亡病例,发病率为3%,包括尿潴留、小肠梗阻、心律失常、伤口感染和胆漏。无胆总管损伤。住院时间从门诊手术到术后7天不等,平均为1.2天。我们得出结论,腹腔镜胆囊切除术可以安全地进行,发病率低,住院时间短,术后恢复快。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项多中心研究。
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991 Jun;1(3):157-9. doi: 10.1089/lps.1991.1.157.
2
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in The Netherlands: early national results].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1992 May 16;136(20):974-7.
3
[Initial experiences with laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术的初步经验]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1991 Feb 16;135(7):272-6.
4
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--what is the value of laparoscopic technique in "difficult" cases?].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术——腹腔镜技术在“困难”病例中的价值是什么?]
Chirurg. 1992 Apr;63(4):296-304.
5
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性和有效性。对100例初治患者的前瞻性分析。
Ann Surg. 1991 Jan;213(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199101000-00002.
6
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术。有症状胆结石的首选治疗方法。
Ann Surg. 1991 Jun;213(6):665-76; discussion 677. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00018.
7
Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis.开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jun;18:196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.083. Epub 2015 May 6.
8
Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era.超越学习曲线:现代腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤发生率已与开腹手术相当。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2239-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4485-2. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
9
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Initial experiences and results in 278 patients].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术。278例患者的初步经验与结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1992 May 15;117(20):775-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1062375.
10
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with mild cirrhosis and symptomatic cholelithiasis.轻度肝硬化合并症状性胆石症患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Transplant Proc. 2007 Jun;39(5):1471-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.01.086.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopy and major retroperitoneal vascular injuries (MRVI).腹腔镜检查与主要腹膜后血管损伤(MRVI)。
Surg Endosc. 1995 Oct;9(10):1096-100. doi: 10.1007/BF00188995.
2
Cholecystectomy. Which procedure is best for the high-risk patient?
Surg Endosc. 1993 Sep-Oct;7(5):395-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00311728.
3
A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.一项比较开放式与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Surg. 1994 Jun;219(6):725-8; discussion 728-31. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199406000-00017.