Scott K M, Von Korff M, Alonso J, Angermeyer M C, Bromet E, Fayyad J, de Girolamo G, Demyttenaere K, Gasquet I, Gureje O, Haro J M, He Y, Kessler R C, Levinson D, Medina Mora M E, Oakley Browne M, Ormel J, Posada-Villa J, Watanabe M, Williams D
Department of Psychological Medicine, Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Psychol Med. 2009 Jan;39(1):33-43. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003188. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
The relationship between mental and physical disorders is well established, but there is less consensus as to the nature of their joint association with disability, in part because additive and interactive models of co-morbidity have not always been clearly differentiated in prior research.
Eighteen general population surveys were carried out among adults as part of the World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative (n=42 697). DSM-IV disorders were assessed using face-to-face interviews with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0). Chronic physical conditions (arthritis, heart disease, respiratory disease, chronic back/neck pain, chronic headache, and diabetes) were ascertained using a standard checklist. Severe disability was defined as on or above the 90th percentile of the WMH version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II).
The odds of severe disability among those with both mental disorder and each of the physical conditions (with the exception of heart disease) were significantly greater than the sum of the odds of the single conditions. The evidence for synergy was model dependent: it was observed in the additive interaction models but not in models assessing multiplicative interactions. Mental disorders were more likely to be associated with severe disability than were the chronic physical conditions.
This first cross-national study of the joint effect of mental and physical conditions on the probability of severe disability finds that co-morbidity exerts modest synergistic effects. Clinicians need to accord both mental and physical conditions equal priority, in order for co-morbidity to be adequately managed and disability reduced.
精神障碍与身体疾病之间的关系已得到充分证实,但对于它们与残疾的联合关联的性质,人们的共识较少,部分原因是先前的研究中合并症的相加和交互模型并未始终得到明确区分。
作为世界心理健康(WMH)调查倡议的一部分,对成年人进行了18项一般人群调查(n = 42697)。使用复合国际诊断访谈(CIDI 3.0)通过面对面访谈评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中的障碍。使用标准清单确定慢性身体疾病(关节炎、心脏病、呼吸系统疾病、慢性背部/颈部疼痛、慢性头痛和糖尿病)。严重残疾定义为世界卫生组织残疾评估量表(WHODAS-II)的WMH版本第90百分位数及以上。
患有精神障碍以及每种身体疾病(心脏病除外)的人群中,严重残疾的几率显著高于单一疾病几率之和。协同作用的证据取决于模型:在相加交互模型中观察到了协同作用,但在评估相乘交互作用的模型中未观察到。精神障碍比慢性身体疾病更有可能与严重残疾相关。
这项关于精神和身体状况对严重残疾可能性的联合影响的首次跨国研究发现,合并症会产生适度的协同作用。临床医生需要对精神和身体状况给予同等重视,以便充分管理合并症并减少残疾。