Nuzzo Gennaro, Giuliante Felice, Giovannini Ivo, Murazio Marino, D'Acapito Fabrizio, Ardito Francesco, Vellone Maria, Gauzolino Riccardo, Costamagna Guido, Di Stasi Carmine
Department of Surgery, Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Am J Surg. 2008 Jun;195(6):763-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.05.046.
The aim of the present study was to highlight the advantages of treatment of bile duct injury (BDI) occurring during cholecystectomy on the basis of a multidisciplinary cooperation of expert surgeons, radiologists, and endoscopists.
Sixty-six patients had major BDIs or short- or long-term failures of repair. BDI was diagnosed intraoperatively in 27 patients (40.9%) and postoperatively in 39 (59.1%) patients. Among referred patients, 30 had complications from bile leak, 15 from obstructive jaundice, and 20 from recurrent cholangitis. Two patients died from sepsis after delayed referral before repair was attempted. Eleven additional patients had minor BDIs with bile leak both with and without choleperitoneum.
Of patients with major BDI, surgical repair was performed in 41 (64.1%). Postsurgical morbidity rate was 15.8%, and there was no mortality. The rate of excellent or good results after surgical repair was 78.0% (32 of 41 patients), and this increased to 87.8% (36 of 41 patients) by continuing treatment with stenting in postsurgical strictures. Biliary stenting alone was performed in 23 patients (35.9%), with excellent or good results in 17 (73.9%). More than 200 endoscopic and percutaneous procedures were performed for initial assessment, treatment of sepsis, nonsurgical repair, contribution to repair, and follow-up. Patients with minor BDIs underwent various combinations of surgical and endoscopic or percutaneous treatments, always with good results.
A multidisciplinary approach was of paramount importance in many phases of treatment of BDI: initial assessment, treatment of secondary complications, resolution of sepsis, percutaneous stenting before surgical repair, dilatation of strictures after repair, final treatment in patients not repaired surgically, and follow-up.
本研究的目的是强调在专家外科医生、放射科医生和内镜医生多学科合作的基础上治疗胆囊切除术期间发生的胆管损伤(BDI)的优势。
66例患者发生了严重BDI或短期或长期修复失败。27例患者(40.9%)术中诊断为BDI,39例患者(59.1%)术后诊断为BDI。在转诊患者中,30例有胆漏并发症,15例有梗阻性黄疸,20例有复发性胆管炎。2例患者在尝试修复前延迟转诊后死于败血症。另外11例患者有轻微BDI,伴有或不伴有胆汁性腹膜炎的胆漏。
在严重BDI患者中,41例(64.1%)进行了手术修复。术后发病率为15.8%,无死亡病例。手术修复后优良结果率为78.0%(41例患者中的32例),通过对术后狭窄继续进行支架置入治疗,这一比例增至87.8%(41例患者中的36例)。单独进行胆管支架置入术的患者有23例(35.9%),其中17例(73.9%)结果优良。为进行初始评估、治疗败血症、非手术修复、辅助修复和随访,实施了200多次内镜和经皮操作。轻度BDI患者接受了手术与内镜或经皮治疗的各种联合治疗,效果均良好。
多学科方法在BDI治疗的许多阶段至关重要:初始评估、治疗继发性并发症、解决败血症、手术修复前的经皮支架置入、修复后狭窄的扩张、未进行手术修复患者的最终治疗以及随访。