Pysek Petr, Richardson David M, Pergl Jan, Jarosík Vojtech, Sixtová Zuzana, Weber Ewald
Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 May;23(5):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Mar 25.
Invasive alien species come from most taxonomic groups, and invasion biology is searching for robust cross-taxon generalizations and principles. An analysis of 2,670 papers dealing with 892 invasive species showed that all major groups of invaders are well studied, but that most information on the mechanisms of invasion has emerged from work on a limited number of the most harmful invaders. A strong geographical bias, with Africa and Asia understudied, inhibits a balanced understanding of invasion, because we might be lacking knowledge of specific invasion mechanisms from poorly studied, regionally specific habitats. International cooperation is required to achieve a more geographically balanced picture of biological invasions. Invasive species with the greatest impact are best studied, but more studies of species that are naturalized but not (yet) invasive are needed to improve understanding of the mechanisms acting during the naturalization phase of invasions and leading to successful invasion.
外来入侵物种来自大多数生物分类群,入侵生物学正在探寻强有力的跨分类群的概括和原理。一项对涉及892种入侵物种的2670篇论文的分析表明,所有主要的入侵物种类别都得到了充分研究,但有关入侵机制的大多数信息都来自对少数最具危害性的入侵物种的研究。存在严重的地理偏差,非洲和亚洲研究不足,这妨碍了对入侵的全面理解,因为我们可能缺乏对研究较少的、具有区域特殊性的栖息地中特定入侵机制的了解。需要开展国际合作,以实现对生物入侵在地理上更均衡的认识。对影响最大的入侵物种研究得最好,但需要更多地研究已归化但尚未构成入侵的物种,以增进对入侵归化阶段以及导致成功入侵的作用机制的理解。