Beal S M, Finch C F
Adelaide Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia.
J Paediatr Child Health. 1991 Dec;27(6):334-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1991.tb00414.x.
A critical overview of 19 case-control studies that have investigated the relationship between prone sleeping position and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is presented. Issues relating to the non-comparability of the studies are described in terms of: (i) case definition; (ii) selection of controls; (iii) quality of the sleeping position data; (iv) recall bias; and (v) adjustment for confounding factors. All studies showed a positive association (2 out of the 19 studies were not significant) between prone sleeping position and SIDS. Meta-analysis techniques applied to six of these studies, based on 'usual' sleeping position in cases and population representative controls, has confirmed an overall higher risk of SIDS in infants who usually sleep prone. The most common odds ratio for an association between prone sleeping position and SIDS was 2.72 (95% confidence interval 2.27-3.26). The extent to which the methodological problems of retrospective case-control studies interfere with our interpretations of this association are discussed.
本文对19项研究俯卧睡眠姿势与婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)之间关系的病例对照研究进行了批判性综述。研究的不可比性问题体现在以下方面:(i)病例定义;(ii)对照的选择;(iii)睡眠姿势数据的质量;(iv)回忆偏倚;以及(v)混杂因素的调整。所有研究均显示俯卧睡眠姿势与SIDS之间存在正相关(19项研究中有2项不显著)。对其中6项研究应用荟萃分析技术,基于病例和具有人群代表性的对照的“通常”睡眠姿势,证实通常俯卧睡眠的婴儿发生SIDS的总体风险更高。俯卧睡眠姿势与SIDS之间关联的最常见比值比为2.72(95%置信区间2.27 - 3.26)。讨论了回顾性病例对照研究的方法学问题对我们解释这种关联的干扰程度。