• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于积极的心理结果:是什么帮助有冲突历史的群体相互原谅与和解?

On positive psychological outcomes: what helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other?

作者信息

Noor Masi, Brown Rupert, Gonzalez Roberto, Manzi Jorge, Lewis Christopher Alan

机构信息

Canterbury Christ Church University, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jun;34(6):819-32. doi: 10.1177/0146167208315555. Epub 2008 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1177/0146167208315555
PMID:18388252
Abstract

Three studies examined the roles of traditional and novel social psychological variables involved in intergroup forgiveness. Study 1 (N = 480) revealed that among the pro-Pinochet and the anti-Pinochet groups in Chile, forgiveness was predicted by ingroup identity (negatively), common ingroup identity (positively), empathy and trust (positively), and competitive victimhood (the subjective sense of having suffered more than the outgroup, negatively). Political ideology (Right vs. Left) moderated the relationship between empathy and forgiveness, trust and forgiveness, and between the latter and competitive victimhood. Study 2 (N = 309), set in the Northern Irish conflict between Protestants and Catholics, provided a replication and extension of Study 1. Finally, Study 3 (N = 155/108) examined the longitudinal relationship between forgiveness and reconciliation in Northern Ireland, revealing that forgiveness predicted reconciliation intentions. The reverse direction of this relationship was also marginally significant. Results are discussed in terms of their theoretical and practical implications.

摘要

三项研究考察了传统和新型社会心理变量在群体间宽恕中所起的作用。研究1(N = 480)表明,在智利支持皮诺切特和反对皮诺切特的群体中,内群体认同(负向)、共同内群体认同(正向)、同理心和信任(正向)以及竞争性受害感(即主观上认为自己比外群体遭受更多苦难,负向)可预测宽恕。政治意识形态(右派与左派)调节了同理心与宽恕、信任与宽恕以及后者与竞争性受害感之间的关系。研究2(N = 309)以新教与天主教之间的北爱尔兰冲突为背景,对研究1进行了重复和扩展。最后,研究3(N = 155/108)考察了北爱尔兰宽恕与和解之间的纵向关系,发现宽恕可预测和解意图。这种关系的反向也略显显著。将根据研究结果的理论和实际意义进行讨论。

相似文献

1
On positive psychological outcomes: what helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other?关于积极的心理结果:是什么帮助有冲突历史的群体相互原谅与和解?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jun;34(6):819-32. doi: 10.1177/0146167208315555. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
2
Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: a new model.北爱尔兰群体间和解的先驱与调解因素:一种新模型。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;47(Pt 3):481-95. doi: 10.1348/014466607X238751. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
3
Taking up offenses: secondhand forgiveness and group identification.承担过错:二手宽恕与群体认同。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Oct;34(10):1406-19. doi: 10.1177/0146167208321538.
4
The Shadows of the Past: Effects of Historical Group Trauma on Current Intergroup Conflicts.《过去的阴影:历史群体创伤对当前群体冲突的影响》。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Apr;43(4):538-554. doi: 10.1177/0146167216689063. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
5
Intergroup reconciliation: effects of adversary's expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients' trust.群体间和解:对手表达同理心、责任感以及接受者信任的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Apr;32(4):459-70. doi: 10.1177/0146167205276431.
6
The practice of interpersonal forgiveness in the personal and professional lives of clergy.神职人员在个人生活和职业生活中人际宽恕的实践。
J Pastoral Care Counsel. 2009 Fall-Winter;63(3-4):7-1-9.
7
Having the power to forgive: when the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness.拥有宽恕的力量:当权力体验增加时,人际宽恕也会增加。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Aug;36(8):1010-23. doi: 10.1177/0146167210376761.
8
Group morality and intergroup relations: cross-cultural and experimental evidence.群体道德与群体间关系:跨文化及实验证据
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;32(11):1559-72. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291673.
9
Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy, and rumination: a longitudinal analysis.婚姻质量、宽恕、同理心与沉思:一项纵向分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Mar;31(3):368-78. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271597.
10
Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing.竞争受害者身份认同作为对群体内伤害行为指控的回应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Apr;102(4):778-95. doi: 10.1037/a0026573. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
An experimental study of the process of felt understanding in intergroup relations: Japanese and Chinese relations in Japan.群体间关系中“共鸣理解”过程的实验研究:以日本的中日关系为例
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 7;14(1):13096. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63227-0.
2
Recovery After Genocide: Understanding the Dimensions of Recovery Capital Among Incarcerated Genocide Perpetrators in Rwanda.种族灭绝后的恢复:了解卢旺达被监禁的种族灭绝罪犯的恢复资本维度
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 16;10:637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00637. eCollection 2019.
3
Intergroup Reconciliation between Flemings and Walloons: The Predictive Value of Cognitive Style, Authoritarian Ideology, and Intergroup Emotions.
佛兰芒人和瓦隆人之间的群体间和解:认知风格、威权主义意识形态和群体间情绪的预测价值
Psychol Belg. 2017 Nov 21;57(3):132-155. doi: 10.5334/pb.333.
4
Collective Victimhood and Ingroup Identity Jointly Shape Intergroup Relations, Even in a Non-violent Conflict: The Case of the Belgians.集体受害者身份与群体内认同共同塑造群体间关系,即使在非暴力冲突中:以比利时人为例。
Psychol Belg. 2017 Nov 21;57(3):98-114. doi: 10.5334/pb.334.
5
Implicit trust between the Uyghur and the Han in Xinjiang, China.中国新疆维吾尔族和汉族之间的隐性信任。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e71829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071829. eCollection 2013.