Meilink A, Hemmen B, Seelen H A M, Kwakkel G
VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Rehabil. 2008 Apr;22(4):291-305. doi: 10.1177/0269215507083368.
To assess whether EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation (EMG-NMES) applied to the extensor muscles of the forearm improves hand function after stroke.
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
A computer-aided literature search up to June 2006 identified articles comparing EMG-NMES of the upper extremity with usual care. Methodological quality was rated on the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale (PEDro), and the Hedges' g model was used to calculate the summary effect sizes (SES) using fixed or random models depending on heterogeneity.
Eight studies, selected out of 192 hits and presenting 157 patients, were included in quantitative and qualitative analyses. The methodological quality ranged from 2 to 6 points. The meta-analysis revealed non-significant effect sizes in favour of EMG-NMES for reaction time, sustained contraction, dexterity measured with the Box and Block manipulation test, synergism measured with the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale and manual dexterity measured with the Action Research Arm test.
No statistically significant differences in effects were found between EMG-NMES and usual care. Most studies had poor methodological quality, low statistical power and insufficient treatment contrast between experimental and control groups. In addition, all studies except two investigated the effects of EMG-NMES in the chronic phase after stroke, whereas the literature suggests that an early start, within the time window in which functional outcome of the upper limb is not fully defined, is more appropriate.
评估应用于前臂伸肌的肌电图触发神经肌肉电刺激(EMG-NMES)是否能改善中风后的手部功能。
随机对照试验的系统评价。
截至2006年6月的计算机辅助文献检索,确定了比较上肢EMG-NMES与常规护理的文章。根据物理治疗证据数据库量表(PEDro)对方法学质量进行评分,并根据异质性使用固定或随机模型,采用Hedges' g模型计算汇总效应量(SES)。
从192篇文献中筛选出8项研究,共157例患者,纳入定量和定性分析。方法学质量评分为2至6分。荟萃分析显示,对于反应时间、持续收缩、用箱块操作测试测量的灵活性、用Fugl-Meyer运动评估量表测量的协同作用以及用动作研究臂测试测量的手动灵活性,支持EMG-NMES的效应量无统计学意义。
EMG-NMES与常规护理之间在效果上未发现统计学上的显著差异。大多数研究的方法学质量较差,统计功效较低,实验组与对照组之间的治疗对比不足。此外,除两项研究外,所有研究均调查了EMG-NMES在中风后慢性期的效果,而文献表明,在尚未完全确定上肢功能结局的时间窗内尽早开始治疗更为合适。