• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于现场研究中氟斑牙摄影评估的标准化装置的开发。

Development of a standardisation device for photographic assessment of dental fluorosis in field studies.

作者信息

Soto-Rojas Armando E, Martínez-Mier E Angeles, Ureña-Cirett Jose, Jackson Richard D, Stookey George K

机构信息

Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 415 Lansing Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2008;6(1):29-36.

PMID:18399305
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the agreement between clinical and photographic assessment of dental fluorosis (DF) in 73 children during a field study, using portable equipment and a standardising device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A dental exam was performed using the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis (TSIF). Photographs of the facial aspects of front teeth and from the occlusal aspect of the mandibular posterior teeth were taken. All photographs were taken following a standard operating procedure. Photographs of anterior and posterior teeth were coded and assigned a random study number. Examiners scored photographs as fluorosis cases or non-cases.

RESULTS

Agreement among the clinical examiners ranged from good to excellent. Agreement was also good for the repeated photographic evaluations. In total, 22% of the children were diagnosed with DF during a clinical exam, and 19% were diagnosed with DF using the photographs.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of this method aided in the photographic assessment of DF. The photographs obtained were a useful tool for documenting DF, to re-train examiners, and to determine intra- and inter-examiner agreement.

摘要

目的

在一项现场研究中,本研究使用便携式设备和标准化装置评估了73名儿童中临床评估与氟斑牙(DF)摄影评估之间的一致性。

材料与方法

使用氟斑牙表面指数(TSIF)进行牙科检查。拍摄了前牙面部和下颌后牙咬合面的照片。所有照片均按照标准操作程序拍摄。对前后牙的照片进行编码并分配一个随机研究编号。检查人员将照片评定为氟斑牙病例或非病例。

结果

临床检查人员之间的一致性从良好到优秀不等。重复摄影评估的一致性也很好。总共有22%的儿童在临床检查中被诊断为DF,19%的儿童通过照片被诊断为DF。

结论

该方法的开发有助于DF的摄影评估。获得的照片是记录DF、重新培训检查人员以及确定检查人员内部和之间一致性的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Development of a standardisation device for photographic assessment of dental fluorosis in field studies.用于现场研究中氟斑牙摄影评估的标准化装置的开发。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2008;6(1):29-36.
2
Examiner reliability in fluorosis scoring: a comparison of photographic and clinical methods.氟中毒评分中检查者的可靠性:摄影法与临床方法的比较
Community Dent Health. 2016 Jun;33(2):145-50.
3
A standardized photographic method for evaluating enamel opacities including fluorosis.一种用于评估包括氟斑牙在内的牙釉质混浊的标准化摄影方法。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;32 Suppl 1:19-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00135.x.
4
Agreement in the diagnosis of dental fluorosis in central incisors performed by a standardized photographic method and clinical examination.采用标准化摄影方法和临床检查对中切牙氟斑牙诊断的一致性。
Cad Saude Publica. 2009 May;25(5):1017-24. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2009000500008.
5
Agreement amongst examiners assessing dental fluorosis from digital photographs using the TF index.使用TF指数通过数码照片评估氟斑牙的检查者之间的一致性。
Community Dent Health. 2007 Mar;24(1):21-5.
6
A visual analog scale for measuring dental fluorosis severity.一种用于测量氟斑牙严重程度的视觉模拟量表。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Jul;136(7):895-901. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0290.
7
Quantitative light fluorescence (QLF) and polarized white light (PWL) assessments of dental fluorosis in an epidemiological setting.定量光荧光(QLF)和偏振白光(PWL)评估在流行病学环境中的氟斑牙。
BMC Public Health. 2012 May 20;12:366. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-366.
8
Examiner reliability of fluorosis scoring: a comparison of photographic and clinical examination findings.氟斑牙计分的检查者可靠性:照片与临床检查结果的比较。
J Public Health Dent. 2012 Spring;72(2):172-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2012.00315.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
9
Comparison of photographic and visual assessment of occlusal caries with histology as the reference standard.比较摄影和视觉评估与组织病理学作为参考标准的龋损。
BMC Oral Health. 2012 Apr 27;12:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-10.
10
Digital epidemiology - Calibrating readers to score dental images remotely.数字流行病学——远程校准读者对牙片的评分。
J Dent. 2018 Jul;74 Suppl 1:S27-S33. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Remote assessment of DMFT and number of implants with intraoral digital photography in an elderly patient population - a comparative study.口腔内数字摄影在老年患者人群中对 DMFT 和种植体数量的远程评估 - 一项比较研究。
PLoS One. 2022 May 17;17(5):e0268360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268360. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparative evaluation of three different recording criteria of dental fluorosis in a known endemic fluoride area of Haryana.比较评价在哈里亚纳邦已知地方性氟中毒地区三种不同的氟斑牙记录标准。
Indian J Med Res. 2018 Jun;147(6):567-572. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_274_17.
3
Validation of ICMR index for identification of dental fluorosis in epidemiological studies.
ICMR指数在流行病学研究中用于识别氟斑牙的验证。
Indian J Med Res. 2016 Jul;144(1):52-57. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.193283.
4
Quantitative light fluorescence (QLF) and polarized white light (PWL) assessments of dental fluorosis in an epidemiological setting.定量光荧光(QLF)和偏振白光(PWL)评估在流行病学环境中的氟斑牙。
BMC Public Health. 2012 May 20;12:366. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-366.