Korres S, Nikolopoulos Thomas P, Peraki E E, Tsiakou M, Karakitsou M, Apostolopoulos N, Economides J, Balatsouras D, Ferekidis E
1st and 2nd Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Athens University, Athens, Greece.
Laryngoscope. 2008 Jul;118(7):1253-6. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816d726c.
To assess the outcomes of neonatal hearing screening with regard to the final diagnosis in a very large number of newborns and investigate related strengths and weaknesses of the program.
In this study, 76,560 newborns were assessed.
All neonates were assessed using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs).
From the 76,560 neonates screened, 1,564 (2%) failed the test. According to the screening protocol, all parents of failed neonates were asked to bring their children 1 month following discharge to repeat the test. Of the 541 (34.6%) newborns who repeated the test, 303 (56%) were found normal and 238 (44%) again failed TEOAE. The latter children were referred to two special public centers for full audiology evaluation. In addition, 124 neonates were also referred due to other reasons revealed in the screening process (family history, high levels of bilirubin, etc.). Of the 362 children who were referred to the two special audiology centers, 113 (31.2%) were evaluated by these two centers. In addition, 42 children who had failed initial screening and did not show up for a follow-up appointment to repeat TEOAE were also assessed in the same centers. Of the 155 children who had a special audiologic evaluation, 56 (36.1%) were found to have hearing loss (HL) and 99 (63.9%) normal hearing. In detail, 28 had bilateral sensorineural HL greater than 40 dB, 10 had unilateral sensorineural HL greater than 40 dB, and 18 had otitis media with effusion or other conductive HL.
Derived from the present study: 1) repeated testing of "failed" newborns in the maternity hospital and before discharge leads to an acceptable referral rate of 2%; 2) the 1-month follow-up of "failed" newborns further limits the false positive results but leads to high rate of newborns lost to follow-up; 3) a dedicated secretariat system should be implemented to follow-up each "failed" newborn and remind parents about their follow-up appointments; and 4) additional measures such as detailed educational material and parental friendly approach should also be implemented.
评估大量新生儿听力筛查的最终诊断结果,并调查该项目的相关优缺点。
本研究共评估了76560名新生儿。
所有新生儿均采用瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAEs)进行评估。
在76560名接受筛查的新生儿中,1564名(2%)筛查未通过。根据筛查方案,所有筛查未通过新生儿的家长被要求在孩子出院后1个月带孩子回来复查。在541名(34.6%)复查的新生儿中,303名(56%)结果正常,238名(44%)TEOAE复查仍未通过。后一组孩子被转至两个专门的公共中心进行全面的听力评估。此外,124名新生儿因筛查过程中发现的其他原因(家族史、高胆红素水平等)也被转诊。在被转至两个专门听力中心的362名儿童中,113名(31.2%)接受了这两个中心的评估。此外,42名初次筛查未通过且未前来复查TEOAE的儿童也在同一中心接受了评估。在155名接受特殊听力评估的儿童中,56名(36.1%)被发现有听力损失(HL),99名(63.9%)听力正常。具体而言,28名双侧感音神经性HL大于40dB,10名单侧感音神经性HL大于40dB,18名有中耳积液或其他传导性HL。
从本研究可得:1)在妇产医院对“未通过”新生儿在出院前进行复查,可使转诊率达到可接受的2%;2)对“未通过”新生儿进行1个月的随访进一步减少了假阳性结果,但导致新生儿失访率较高;3)应实施专门的秘书系统来跟踪每个“未通过”的新生儿并提醒家长进行随访预约;4)还应采取其他措施,如提供详细的教育材料和采用家长友好型方式。