Bitzer Eva Maria, Lorenz Christoph, Nickel Stefan, Dörning Hans, Trojan Alf
ISEG-Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health System Research, Lavesstr. 80, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2712-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9878-z. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
The project aimed at testing the feasibility of a quality improvement system based on patient-reported outcomes in short-stay surgery for cholecystectomy.
In two centers for short-stay surgery, patients referred for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were surveyed between Aug 1999 and Jan 2002. Patients reported on health-related quality of life (SF-36), symptoms (gallstone symptom checklist, GSCL) and other indicators preoperatively (T0), 14 days (T1) and 6 months postoperatively (T2). The SF-36 subscales physical functioning, bodily pain, and role physical as well as the GSCL and treatment satisfaction at T2 were considered as main outcomes. The main outcomes were analyzed by generalized linear models with regard to predictors.
At T0 a total of 205 patients were included. The response rate at T2 was 63.4% (74.6% females, 53.6 years of age). The GSCL score at T0 (29.4% preoperatively) fell slightly to 27.9% at T1 and decreased to 14.8% at T2 (T0-T2: p < 0.001). The SF-36 subscales showed a different course over time (decrease of health-related quality of life at T1 and large increase at T2). The level of satisfaction with the outcome of cholecystectomy was 82.3%. The patient-reported outcomes were mainly influenced by the preoperative level, age and self-reported postoperative complaints.
The low response rate was mainly due to nondelivery of questionnaires at T1 during the regular postoperative visit by the operating physician. Though nonresponse occurs under conditions of routine care, meaningful information was gained, which should be used for quality improvement activities. Because the preoperative level is a major determinant of the postoperative health outcomes, the prospective pre-post measurement should be preferred if institutional comparisons are intended.
该项目旨在测试基于患者报告结局的质量改进系统在胆囊切除术短期手术中的可行性。
在两个短期手术中心,对1999年8月至2002年1月期间转诊接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行了调查。患者在术前(T0)、术后14天(T1)和术后6个月(T2)报告了与健康相关的生活质量(SF-36)、症状(胆结石症状清单,GSCL)和其他指标。SF-36量表的身体功能、身体疼痛、角色身体以及T2时的GSCL和治疗满意度被视为主要结局。主要结局通过广义线性模型针对预测因素进行分析。
T0时共纳入205例患者。T2时的应答率为63.4%(女性占74.6%,年龄53.6岁)。T0时的GSCL评分(术前为29.4%)在T1时略有下降至27.9%,在T2时降至14.8%(T0 - T2:p < 0.001)。SF-36量表各维度随时间呈现不同变化趋势(T1时与健康相关的生活质量下降,T2时大幅上升)。对胆囊切除术后结局的满意度为82.3%。患者报告的结局主要受术前水平、年龄和自我报告的术后不适影响。
低应答率主要是由于手术医生在常规术后访视时未在T1发放问卷。尽管在常规护理条件下会出现无应答情况,但仍获得了有意义的信息,应将其用于质量改进活动。由于术前水平是术后健康结局的主要决定因素,如果打算进行机构间比较,应优先采用前瞻性术前 - 术后测量。