Suppr超能文献

透皮丁丙诺啡的疗效与安全性:一项针对289例重度癌痛患者的随机、安慰剂对照试验。

Efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 289 patients with severe cancer pain.

作者信息

Poulain Philippe, Denier Willy, Douma Joep, Hoerauf Klaus, Samija Mirko, Sopata Maciej, Wolfram Gernot

机构信息

Department of Supportive Care, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Aug;36(2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.09.011. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

Abstract

Strong opioids are recommended for treating severe cancer pain in the advanced stages of the disease. Few data are available concerning the efficacy of buprenorphine in cancer pain. We compared transdermal buprenorphine 70 microg/h (BUP TDS) to placebo in an enriched design study. Opioid-tolerant patients with cancer pain requiring strong opioids in the dose range of 90-150 mg/d oral morphine equivalents entered a two-week run-in phase, during which they were converted to BUP TDS. Patients who could be stabilized on BUP TDS were randomized to BUP TDS or placebo patch for a two-week maintenance phase. Rescue medication (buprenorphine sublingual tablets 0.2mg) was allowed as required. Response was defined as a mean pain intensity of <5 (0-10 scale) and a mean daily buprenorphine sublingual tablet intake of < or =2 tablets during the maintenance phase. Of 289 patients who entered the run-in phase, 100 discontinued treatment due to lack of efficacy or adverse events; 189 patients continued treatment in the maintenance phase (94 BUP TDS, 95 placebo), of whom 31 discontinued treatment (7 BUP TDS, 24 placebo). A significant difference in the number of treatment responders was observed: 70 BUP TDS (74.5%, 65.7-83.3) vs. 47 placebo (50%, 39.9-60.1) (P=0.0003). This result was supported by a lower daily pain intensity, lower intake of buprenorphine sublingual tablets and fewer dropouts in the BUP TDS group. The incidence of adverse events was slightly higher for BUP TDS. In conclusion, BUP TDS 70 microg/h is an efficacious and safe treatment for patients with severe cancer pain.

摘要

对于疾病晚期的重度癌痛,推荐使用强效阿片类药物进行治疗。关于丁丙诺啡治疗癌痛的疗效,现有数据较少。我们在一项富集设计研究中,将70微克/小时的透皮丁丙诺啡(BUP TDS)与安慰剂进行了比较。对阿片类药物耐受、患有癌痛且需要90-150毫克/天口服吗啡当量剂量范围的强效阿片类药物的患者,进入为期两周的导入期,在此期间他们被转换为BUP TDS。能够在BUP TDS上实现稳定的患者被随机分为BUP TDS组或安慰剂组,进行为期两周的维持期治疗。必要时允许使用解救药物(0.2毫克丁丙诺啡舌下片)。反应的定义为维持期平均疼痛强度<5(0-10分制),且平均每日丁丙诺啡舌下片摄入量<或=2片。在进入导入期的289例患者中,100例因缺乏疗效或不良事件而停止治疗;189例患者在维持期继续治疗(94例BUP TDS组,95例安慰剂组),其中31例停止治疗(7例BUP TDS组,24例安慰剂组)。观察到治疗反应者数量存在显著差异:70例BUP TDS组(74.5%,65.7-83.3) vs. 47例安慰剂组(50%,39.9-60.1)(P=0.0003)。这一结果得到了BUP TDS组每日疼痛强度较低、丁丙诺啡舌下片摄入量较低以及退出率较低的支持。BUP TDS组不良事件的发生率略高。总之,70微克/小时的BUP TDS对重度癌痛患者是一种有效且安全的治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验