Obasi Chijioke
Centre for Ethnicity and Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008 Fall;13(4):455-65. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enn008. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
This article draws on some of the existing literature on the politics of identity and representation as related to minority group formation. It applies this to constructions of Deaf2 identity from a cultural and linguistic perspective and contrasts this with dominant constructions of Deaf people as disabled. It highlights a number of ways in which Deaf identity differs from disabled identity, demonstrating that the cultural and linguistic construction of Deaf people is a more useful tool for analysis. It raises questions aimed to examine the discourse on deafness and seeks further debate on how best the discourse can be progressed. The article raises issues related to the use of terminology and labeling in the field of deafness. It contends that the continued use of the word deafness is unworkable and should be more widely recognized as a social construct, which has current usage beyond the paradigm in which it was originally intended. The article concludes by recognizing the importance of diversity in identity formation, while simultaneously calling for an appreciation of the need to incorporate this diversity within wider theorizing, focused on commonality and cohesion in identity as a source of collective expression and political mobilization.
本文借鉴了一些现有的关于身份政治和表征与少数群体形成相关的文献。它从文化和语言的角度将其应用于聋人身份的建构,并将此与将聋人视为残疾人的主流建构进行对比。它突出了聋人身份与残疾身份不同的多种方式,表明聋人的文化和语言建构是一种更有用的分析工具。它提出了旨在审视关于聋ness的话语的问题,并寻求关于如何最好地推进该话语的进一步辩论。本文提出了与聋ness领域术语使用和标签相关的问题。它认为继续使用“聋ness”一词是行不通的,并且应该更广泛地被视为一种社会建构,其当前的用法超出了其最初所设想的范式。本文最后认识到身份形成中多样性的重要性,同时呼吁认识到需要将这种多样性纳入更广泛的理论化之中,这种理论化侧重于身份的共性和凝聚力,将其作为集体表达和政治动员的源泉。