Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
JAMA. 2012 Jul 4;308(1):60-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7048.
Little is known about the cost associated with a health center's rating as a patient-centered medical home (PCMH).
To determine whether PCMH rating is associated with operating cost among health centers funded by the US Health Resources and Services Administration.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of PCMH rating and operating cost in 2009. PCMH rating was assessed through surveys of health center administrators conducted by Harris Interactive of all 1009 Health Resources and Services Administration–funded community health centers. The survey provided scores from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) for total PCMH score and 6 subscales: access/communication, care management, external coordination, patient tracking, test/referral tracking, and quality improvement. Costs were obtained from the Uniform Data System reports submitted to the Health Resources and Services Administration. We used generalized linear models to determine the relationship between PCMH rating and operating cost.
Operating cost per physician full-time equivalent, operating cost per patient per month, and medical cost per visit.
Six hundred sixty-nine health centers (66%) were included in the study sample, with 340 excluded because of nonresponse or incomplete data. Mean total PCMH score was 60 (SD, 12; range, 21-90). For the average health center, a 10-point higher total PCMH score was associated with a $2.26 (4.6%) higher operating cost per patient per month (95% CI, $0.86-$4.12). Among PCMH subscales, a 10-point higher score for patient tracking was associated with higher operating cost per physician full-time equivalent ($27,300; 95% CI, $3047-$57,804) and higher operating cost per patient per month ($1.06; 95% CI, $0.29-$1.98). A 10-point higher score for quality improvement was also associated with higher operating cost per physician full-time equivalent ($32,731; 95% CI, $1571-$73,670) and higher operating cost per patient per month ($1.86; 95% CI, $0.54-$3.61). A 10-point higher PCMH subscale score for access/communication was associated with lower operating cost per physician full-time equivalent ($39,809; 95% CI, $1893-$63,169).
According to a survey of health center administrators, higher scores on a scale that assessed 6 aspects of the PCMH were associated with higher health center operating costs. Two subscales of the medical home were associated with higher cost and 1 with lower cost.
关于医疗中心作为以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)的评级所带来的相关成本,我们知之甚少。
旨在确定 PCMH 评级是否与美国卫生资源与服务管理局(HRSA)资助的医疗中心的运营成本相关。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项针对 2009 年 PCMH 评级和运营成本的横截面研究。通过哈里斯互动公司对所有 1009 家 HRSA 资助的社区医疗中心的管理人员进行的调查,评估 PCMH 的评级。该调查提供了从 0(最差)到 100(最佳)的总 PCMH 评分和 6 个分量表的分数:获取/沟通、护理管理、外部协调、患者跟踪、测试/转诊跟踪和质量改进。成本来自向 HRSA 提交的统一数据系统报告。我们使用广义线性模型来确定 PCMH 评级与运营成本之间的关系。
每位医师全职当量的运营成本、每位患者每月的运营成本和每次就诊的医疗费用。
研究样本包括 669 家医疗中心(66%),340 家因无回应或数据不完整而被排除在外。总 PCMH 评分为 60(标准差,12;范围,21-90)。对于平均医疗中心而言,总 PCMH 评分每提高 10 分,每月每位患者的运营成本就会增加 2.26 美元(4.6%)(95%CI,0.86-4.12 美元)。在 PCMH 分量表中,患者跟踪的评分每提高 10 分,每位医师全职当量的运营成本(27300 美元;95%CI,3047-57804 美元)和每位患者每月的运营成本(1.06 美元;95%CI,0.29-1.98 美元)就会更高。质量改进的评分每提高 10 分,每位医师全职当量的运营成本(32731 美元;95%CI,1571-73670 美元)和每位患者每月的运营成本(1.86 美元;95%CI,0.54-3.61 美元)也会更高。获取/沟通分量表的评分每提高 10 分,每位医师全职当量的运营成本(39809 美元;95%CI,1893-63169 美元)就会更低。
根据对医疗中心管理人员的调查,评估 PCMH 六个方面的量表评分越高,医疗中心的运营成本就越高。医疗之家的两个分量表与更高的成本相关,而一个分量表与更低的成本相关。