Cressey Tim R, Green Hannah, Khoo Saye, Treluyer Jean-Marc, Compagnucci Alexandra, Saidi Yacine, Lallemant Marc, Gibb Diana M, Burger David M
Institut de Recherché pour le Développement, Program for HIV Prevention and Treatment, UR 174, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 May 15;46(10):1601-8. doi: 10.1086/587657.
The optimum strategy for stopping treatment with drugs that have different half-lives in a combination regimen to minimize the risk of selecting drug-resistant viruses remains unknown. We evaluated drug concentrations in plasma, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) load, and development of drug resistance after a planned treatment interruption of a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-containing regimen in HIV type 1-infected children.
Children with viral loads <50 copies/mL and CD4 cell percentages > or =30% (for children aged 2-6 years) or CD4 cell percentages > or =25% and CD4 cell counts > or =500 cells/microL (for children aged 7-15 years) were randomized to either a planned treatment interruption or to continuous therapy. In the planned treatment interruption arm, either (1) treatment with nevirapine or efavirenz was stopped, and treatment with the remaining drugs was continued for 7-14 days, or (2) nevirapine or efavirenz were replaced by a protease inhibitor, and all drugs were stopped after 7-14 days. Sampling for determination of plasma drug concentrations, measurement of viral load, and drug resistance testing was scheduled at day 0, day 7 (drug concentrations only), day 14, and day 28 after interruption of treatment with an NNRTI.
Treatment with an NNRTI was interrupted for 35 children (20 were receiving nevirapine, and 15 were receiving efavirenz). Median time from NNRTI cessation to stopping all drugs was 9 days (range, 6-15 days) for nevirapine and 14 days (range, 6-18 days) for efavirenz. At 7 days, 1 (5%) of 19 and 4 (50%) of 8 children had detectable nevirapine and efavirenz concentrations, respectively; efavirenz remained detectable in 3 (25%) of 12 children at 14 days. At 14 days, viral load was > or =50 copies/mL in 6 of 16 children interrupting treatment with nevirapine (range, 52-7000 copies/mL) and in 2 of 12 children interrupting treatment with efavirenz (range, 120-1600 copies/mL). No new NNRTI mutations were observed.
In children with virological suppression who experienced interruption of treatment with an NNRTI, staggered or replacement stopping strategies for a median of 9 days for nevirapine and 14 days for efavirenz were not associated with the selection of NNRTI resistance mutations.
在联合治疗方案中停用具有不同半衰期的药物以尽量降低选择耐药病毒风险的最佳策略尚不清楚。我们评估了1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染儿童在计划中断含非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI)治疗方案后血浆中的药物浓度、HIV载量以及耐药性的发展情况。
病毒载量<50拷贝/mL且CD4细胞百分比>或 =30%(2至6岁儿童)或CD4细胞百分比>或 =25%且CD4细胞计数>或 =500个细胞/微升(7至15岁儿童)的儿童被随机分为计划治疗中断组或持续治疗组。在计划治疗中断组中,要么(1)停用奈韦拉平或依非韦伦,并继续使用其余药物治疗7至14天,要么(2)用蛋白酶抑制剂替代奈韦拉平或依非韦伦,7至14天后停用所有药物。在中断NNRTI治疗后的第0天、第7天(仅测定药物浓度)、第14天和第28天安排采样以测定血浆药物浓度、测量病毒载量并进行耐药性检测。
35名儿童中断了NNRTI治疗(20名接受奈韦拉平治疗,15名接受依非韦伦治疗)。从停用NNRTI到停用所有药物的中位时间,奈韦拉平为9天(范围6至15天),依非韦伦为14天(范围6至18天)。在第7天,19名儿童中有1名(5%)和8名儿童中有4名(50%)分别检测到了奈韦拉平和依非韦伦的浓度;在第14天,12名儿童中有3名(25%)仍可检测到依非韦伦。在第14天,中断奈韦拉平治疗的16名儿童中有6名(病毒载量>或 =50拷贝/mL,范围52至7000拷贝/mL),中断依非韦伦治疗的12名儿童中有2名(病毒载量>或 =50拷贝/mL,范围120至1600拷贝/mL)。未观察到新的NNRTI突变。
在病毒学得到抑制且经历了NNRTI治疗中断的儿童中,奈韦拉平中位9天、依非韦伦中位14天的错开或替代停药策略与NNRTI耐药突变的选择无关。