Franceschini Maria Angela, Nissilä Ilkka, Wu Weicheng, Diamond Solomon G, Bonmassar Giorgio, Boas David A
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 13th Street Bldg. 149 (room 2301), Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Neuroimage. 2008 Jun;41(2):189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.061. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
We studied the relationship between somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) recorded with scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and hemoglobin responses recorded non-invasively with diffuse optical imaging (DOI) during parametrically varied electrical forepaw stimulation in rats. Using these macroscopic techniques we verified that the hemodynamic response is not linearly coupled to the somatosensory evoked potentials, and that a power or threshold law best describes the coupling between SEP and the hemoglobin response, in agreement with the results of most invasive studies. We decompose the SEP response in three components (P1, N1, and P2) to determine which best predicts the hemoglobin response. We found that N1 and P2 predict the hemoglobin response significantly better than P1 and the input stimuli (S). Previous electrophysiology studies reported in the literature show that P1 originates in layer IV directly from thalamocortical afferents, while N1 and P2 originate in layers I and II and reflect the majority of local cortico-cortical interactions. Our results suggest that the evoked hemoglobin response is driven by the cortical synaptic activity and not by direct thalamic input. The N1 and P2 components, and not P1, need to be considered to correctly interpret neurovascular coupling.
我们研究了在对大鼠进行参数变化的前爪电刺激期间,通过头皮脑电图(EEG)记录的体感诱发电位(SEP)与通过漫射光学成像(DOI)非侵入性记录的血红蛋白反应之间的关系。使用这些宏观技术,我们证实了血液动力学反应与体感诱发电位并非线性耦合,并且幂律或阈值定律最能描述SEP与血红蛋白反应之间的耦合,这与大多数侵入性研究的结果一致。我们将SEP反应分解为三个成分(P1、N1和P2),以确定哪个成分最能预测血红蛋白反应。我们发现,N1和P2预测血红蛋白反应的能力明显优于P1和输入刺激(S)。文献中先前报道的电生理学研究表明,P1直接起源于丘脑皮质传入纤维的IV层,而N1和P2起源于I层和II层,反映了大部分局部皮质-皮质相互作用。我们的结果表明,诱发的血红蛋白反应是由皮质突触活动驱动的,而不是由直接的丘脑输入驱动的。为了正确解释神经血管耦合,需要考虑N1和P2成分,而不是P1成分。