Anaya Henry D, Hoang Tuyen, Golden Joya F, Goetz Matthew Bidwell, Gifford Allen, Bowman Candice, Osborn Teresa, Owens Douglas K, Sanders Gillian D, Asch Steven M
Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):800-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0617-x. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
HIV testing is cost-effective in unselected general medical populations, yet testing rates among those at risk remain low, even among those with regular primary care. HIV rapid testing is effective in many healthcare settings, but scant research has been done within primary care settings or within the US Department of Veteran's Affairs Healthcare System.
We evaluated three methods proven effective in other diseases/settings: nurse standing orders for testing, streamlined counseling, and HIV rapid testing.
Randomized, controlled trial with three intervention models: model A (traditional counseling/testing); model B (nurse-initiated screening, traditional counseling/testing); model C (nurse-initiated screening, streamlined counseling/rapid testing).
Two hundred fifty-one patients with primary/urgent care appointments in two VA clinics in the same city (one large urban hospital, one freestanding outpatient clinic in a high HIV prevalence area).
Rates of HIV testing and receipt of results; sexual risk reduction; HIV knowledge improvement.
Testing rates were 40.2% (model A), 84.5% (model B), and 89.3% (model C; p = <.01). Test result receipt rates were 14.6% (model A), 31.0% (model B), 79.8% (model C; all p = <.01). Sexual risk reduction and knowledge improvement did not differ significantly between counseling methods.
Streamlined counseling with rapid testing significantly increased testing and receipt rates over current practice without changes in risk behavior or posttest knowledge. Increased testing and receipt of results could lead to earlier disease identification, increased treatment, and reduced morbidity/mortality. Policymakers should consider streamlined counseling/rapid testing when implementing routine HIV testing into primary/urgent care.
在未经筛选的普通医疗人群中,HIV检测具有成本效益,但高危人群的检测率仍然很低,即使是在有定期初级保健的人群中也是如此。HIV快速检测在许多医疗环境中都有效,但在初级保健环境或美国退伍军人事务部医疗系统内进行的研究很少。
我们评估了三种在其他疾病/环境中已被证明有效的方法:护士检测常备医嘱、简化咨询和HIV快速检测。
采用三种干预模式的随机对照试验:模式A(传统咨询/检测);模式B(护士发起筛查、传统咨询/检测);模式C(护士发起筛查、简化咨询/快速检测)。
在同一城市的两家退伍军人事务部诊所(一家大型城市医院、一家位于HIV高流行地区的独立门诊诊所)预约初级/紧急护理的251名患者。
HIV检测率和结果接收率;性风险降低情况;HIV知识改善情况。
检测率分别为40.2%(模式A)、84.5%(模式B)和89.3%(模式C;p<0.01)。检测结果接收率分别为14.6%(模式A)、31.0%(模式B)和79.8%(模式C;所有p<0.01)。咨询方法之间的性风险降低和知识改善情况没有显著差异。
与当前做法相比,简化咨询与快速检测显著提高了检测率和结果接收率,而风险行为或检测后知识没有变化。检测率和结果接收率的提高可能会导致疾病的早期识别、治疗增加以及发病率/死亡率降低。政策制定者在将常规HIV检测纳入初级/紧急护理时应考虑简化咨询/快速检测。