Holland Nan, Segraves Denise, Nnadi Victoria O, Belletti Daniel A, Wogen Jenifer, Arcona Steve
Forsyth Medical Group, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Dis Manag. 2008 Apr;11(2):71-7. doi: 10.1089/dis.2008.1120007.
The role of clinical inertia in the treatment of patients with hypertension was assessed by evaluating health care providers' knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding hypertension management. A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the Forsyth Medical Group in North Carolina. Participants were physicians (N = 18, 10 sites) and support staff (N = 20, 12 sites), who were surveyed in 2006. Physician and support staff questionnaires consisted of 29 and 15 items, respectively, and were administered by trained interviewers. Though most physicians (94%) cited familiarity with the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-7) guidelines and affirmed that hypertension management guidelines are relevant to their patients, no physicians interviewed routinely document patient hypertension management plans. Although 1 in 3 physicians cited the inability to devote enough time to patients for the discussion of hypertension management, physicians predominantly cited patient- and support-staff- related factors as most important to patients not attaining blood pressure (BP) goal. Patient lifestyle modification (89%), education (67%), and medication compliance (56%) were cited as the most important reasons for uncontrolled BP. Only one-third of physicians believe that clinical staff always obtain accurate BP measurements, and 61% believe that resistant hypertension is a reflection of inaccurate BP measurement. Many support staff claimed to be rushed when measuring patient BP, and 65% recommended BP competency training. Contradictions were evident between provider knowledge of hypertension management standards and how this knowledge is applied in clinical practice. Standardized collection of BP is critical to measuring clinical improvement in hypertension. Results are being utilized to develop clinical improvement initiatives including staff education and competency training.
通过评估医疗保健提供者关于高血压管理的知识、态度和临床实践,来评估临床惰性在高血压患者治疗中的作用。在北卡罗来纳州的福赛思医疗集团进行了一项横断面调查。参与者为医生(N = 18,10个地点)和辅助人员(N = 20,12个地点),于2006年接受调查。医生问卷和辅助人员问卷分别包含29项和15项内容,由经过培训的访谈员进行发放。尽管大多数医生(94%)表示熟悉《美国国家联合委员会关于预防、检测、评估和治疗高血压的第七次报告》(JNC - 7)指南,并确认高血压管理指南与他们的患者相关,但接受访谈的医生均未常规记录患者的高血压管理计划。虽然三分之一的医生表示无法投入足够时间与患者讨论高血压管理,但医生们主要将与患者和辅助人员相关的因素视为患者未达到血压(BP)目标的最重要因素。患者生活方式改变(89%)、教育(67%)和药物依从性(56%)被认为是血压未得到控制的最重要原因。只有三分之一的医生认为临床工作人员总能获得准确的血压测量值,61%的医生认为难治性高血压是血压测量不准确的反映。许多辅助人员称在测量患者血压时很匆忙,65%的人建议进行血压测量能力培训。医疗服务提供者对高血压管理标准的知识与该知识在临床实践中的应用之间存在明显矛盾。标准化的血压测量对于评估高血压的临床改善情况至关重要。研究结果正被用于制定临床改善措施,包括员工教育和能力培训。