• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的治疗:经皮顺行输尿管碎石术与逆行输尿管碎石术的随机对照研究

Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.

作者信息

Sun Xiaowen, Xia Shujie, Lu Jun, Liu Haitao, Han Bangmin, Li Weiguo

机构信息

The Affiliated First People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Department of Urology, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2008 May;22(5):913-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0230.

DOI:10.1089/end.2007.0230
PMID:18429682
Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared the safety and efficacy of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy with retrograde ureterolithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureter stones in a prospective randomized manner.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 91 patients with large impacted proximal ureteral stones, defined as stones >1 cm in size located between the ureteropelvic junction and the lower border of the fourth lumbar vertebra, were prospectively randomized for antegrade (44) or retrograde (47) ureterolithotripsy. Failure of the procedure (conversion to an open procedure), intraoperative and postoperative morbidity, operative time, hospital stay, stone clearance at discharge home, and follow-up were analyzed in each group.

RESULTS

The main complications were bleeding (2.3%; 1 of 43) for the antegrade procedure and ureteral injury (2.3%; 1 of 44) for the retrograde procedure. Percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy was associated with longer operative times (75.4+/-11.8 v 30.6+/-7.8 minutes; P<0.001), longer hospital stay (6.3+/-0.5 v 2.1+/-0.4 days; P<0.001), and a longer interval to return to normal activities (7.8+/-0.7 v 2.7+/-0.6 days; P<0.001). Nevertheless, the percutaneous antegrade procedure had a higher stone-free rate both at discharge home (95.3% v 79.5%; P=0.027), and 1 month post-procedure (100% v 86.4%; P=0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy is a valuable treatment modality for impacted proximal ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm, and achieves higher stone-free rates than those of retrograde ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy. The drawbacks of the antegrade procedure are longer operative time and hospital stay.

摘要

目的

我们以前瞻性随机方式比较了经皮顺行输尿管碎石术与逆行输尿管碎石术治疗大型嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

共有91例大型嵌顿性近端输尿管结石患者,定义为位于输尿管肾盂连接处与第四腰椎下缘之间、大小>1 cm的结石,被前瞻性随机分为顺行(44例)或逆行(47例)输尿管碎石术组。分析每组手术失败(转为开放手术)、术中和术后发病率、手术时间、住院时间、出院时结石清除情况及随访情况。

结果

主要并发症为顺行手术组出血(2.3%;43例中的1例)和逆行手术组输尿管损伤(2.3%;44例中的1例)。经皮顺行输尿管碎石术的手术时间更长(75.4±11.8对30.6±7.8分钟;P<0.001)、住院时间更长(6.3±0.5对2.1±0.4天;P<0.001)以及恢复正常活动的间隔时间更长(7.8±0.7对2.7±0.6天;P<0.001)。然而,经皮顺行手术在出院时(95.3%对79.5%;P=0.027)和术后1个月(第100%对86.4%;P=0.026)的结石清除率更高。

结论

经皮顺行输尿管碎石术是治疗大于1 cm的嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的一种有价值的治疗方式,并且比钬:YAG激光碎石术的逆行输尿管镜检查具有更高的结石清除率。顺行手术的缺点是手术时间和住院时间更长。

相似文献

1
Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.大型嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的治疗:经皮顺行输尿管碎石术与逆行输尿管碎石术的随机对照研究
J Endourol. 2008 May;22(5):913-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0230.
2
Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy.前瞻性随机研究治疗大型上段输尿管结石:体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术与腹腔镜。
J Urol. 2012 Jan;187(1):164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.054. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
3
Rapid, economical treatment of large impacted calculi in the proximal ureter with ballistic ureteral lithotripsy and occlusive, percutaneous balloon catheter: the high pressure irrigation technique.应用弹道输尿管碎石术和闭塞性经皮气囊导管对近端输尿管大的嵌顿结石进行快速、经济的治疗:高压冲洗技术
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):929-33; discussion 933-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.037. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
4
Impacted upper-ureteral calculi >1 cm: blind access and totally tubeless percutaneous antegrade removal or retrograde approach?大于1厘米的嵌顿性上段输尿管结石:盲目入路与完全无管化经皮顺行取出术还是逆行入路?
J Endourol. 2006 Sep;20(9):616-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.616.
5
Two-step minipercutaneous ureterolithotripsy under multimodal analgesia for complicated impacted calculi in proximal ureter.多模式镇痛下两步微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗上段嵌顿性复杂结石。
Urology. 2013 Jun;81(6):1147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.080. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
6
Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.治疗大的嵌顿性上段输尿管结石:微创经皮顺行输尿管碎石术与逆行输尿管碎石术的随机比较。
World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1605-10. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1026-2. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
7
Impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy.结石大小、位置、成分、嵌顿及肾积水对钬激光输尿管镜碎石术疗效的影响
Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1751-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.029. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
8
Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized study.经皮闭塞球囊导管辅助输尿管镜碎石术治疗大型嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的临床疗效、安全性及成本:一项前瞻性随机研究
J Endourol. 2014 Sep;28(9):1064-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0167. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
9
Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.近端输尿管结石的治疗:钬激光输尿管碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术的对比
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1972-6.
10
Large impacted upper ureteral calculi: A comparative study between retrograde ureterolithotripsy and percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy in the modified lateral position.大型嵌顿性上段输尿管结石:改良侧卧位下行逆行输尿管镜碎石术与经皮顺行输尿管镜碎石术的对比研究
Urol Ann. 2013 Jul;5(3):140-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.115729.

引用本文的文献

1
A prospective comparative study between retrograde intrarenal surgery vs supine mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for single upper ureteric stones >10 mm.一项针对直径大于10毫米的单一上段输尿管结石,逆行性肾内手术与仰卧位微创经皮肾镜取石术的前瞻性对比研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(1):77-84. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.0205. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
The Saudi urological association guidelines on urolithiasis.沙特泌尿外科协会尿路结石指南。
Urol Ann. 2024 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-27. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_120_23. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
3
Percutaneous antegrade management of large proximal ureteral stones using non-papillary puncture.
使用非乳头穿刺对近端输尿管大结石进行经皮顺行处理。
Asian J Urol. 2024 Jan;11(1):110-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
4
Medial deviation of the ureter is a new sign that could predict stone impaction: a pilot study.输尿管向内侧偏移是预测结石嵌顿的新征象:一项初步研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Dec;55(12):3033-3038. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03744-5. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
5
[Comparison of safety and effectiveness of active migration technique and lithotripsy technique in the treatment of 1-2 cm upper ureteral calculi by flexible ure-teroscopy].[输尿管软镜下主动移位技术与碎石技术治疗1-2cm上段输尿管结石的安全性及有效性比较]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jun 18;55(3):553-557. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.03.024.
6
'Boxing in the corner': A modified retrograde approach for the management of proximal ureteric stones of 1-2 cm.“角落拳击法”:一种改良的逆行方法用于处理1 - 2厘米的近端输尿管结石
Arab J Urol. 2021 Feb 2;19(2):141-146. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1881421.
7
Comparison of efficacy and safety of various management options for large upper ureteric stones a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较各种对上段输尿管大结石的处理方法的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91364-3.
8
Comparison of antegrade and retrograde ureterolithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.顺行与逆行输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗上段输尿管结石的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Mar;10(3):1179-1191. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1296.
9
Antegrade mini-percutaneous flexible ureteroscopy versus retrograde ureteroscopy for treating impacted proximal ureteric stones of 1-2 cm: A prospective randomised study.顺行性微通道经皮输尿管软镜与逆行输尿管镜治疗1-2厘米嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的前瞻性随机研究
Arab J Urol. 2020 Aug 23;18(3):176-180. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1769385.
10
Comparison of retrograde ureterorenoscopy (URS) and percutaneous anterograde ureteroscopy for removal of impacted upper ureteral stones >10mm in the elderly population.比较逆行输尿管镜(URS)和经皮顺行输尿管镜治疗老年人 >10mm 嵌顿上段输尿管结石。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jan-Feb;47(1):64-70. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0638.