• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗大的嵌顿性上段输尿管结石:微创经皮顺行输尿管碎石术与逆行输尿管碎石术的随机比较。

Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.

机构信息

Department of Urology; The First Affiliated Hospital (Jiangsu Province Hospital of TCM), Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210046, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1605-10. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1026-2. Epub 2013 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-013-1026-2
PMID:23334470
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide appropriate evidence for treatment planning of patients with an impacted proximal ureteral stones ≥1.5 cm in size, by analyzing the therapeutic outcomes for those undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy and retrograde ureterolithotripsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September 2010 to November 2011, eligible patients with impacted proximal ureteral stones ≥1.5 cm in size referred to our institute were considered for this study. The closed envelope method was used to randomize the enrolled patients to mini-PCNL (30) or retrograde ureterolithotripsy (29). The efficiency quotient (EQ) was calculated to specifically address the efficiency for both the techniques. All preoperative and postoperative data for both groups were recorded.

RESULTS

The initial stone-free rate was 93.3% in the mini-PCNL group and 41.4% in the URSL group (p < 0.001). However, the overall stone-free rate at the 1-month follow-up visit after initial treatment was 100% in the mini-PCNL group and 89.7% in the URSL group (p = 0.07). The EQs for the mini-PCNL and URSL groups were 0.83 and 0.50, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that mini-PCNL removal of large impacted proximal ureteral calculi can achieve higher stone-free rates and safe.

摘要

目的

通过分析微创经皮顺行输尿管镜碎石术与逆行输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性近端输尿管结石≥1.5cm 的疗效,为此类患者的治疗方案提供合理的依据。

患者与方法

本研究纳入 2010 年 9 月至 2011 年 11 月期间我院收治的符合要求的嵌顿性近端输尿管结石≥1.5cm 的患者。采用信封法将纳入患者随机分为微创经皮顺行输尿管镜碎石术(30 例)或逆行输尿管镜碎石术(29 例)组。采用效率指数(EQ)专门评估两种技术的效率。记录两组所有术前和术后数据。

结果

微创经皮顺行输尿管镜碎石术组的初始结石清除率为 93.3%,逆行输尿管镜碎石术组为 41.4%(p<0.001)。然而,初始治疗后 1 个月随访时,微创经皮顺行输尿管镜碎石术组的总体结石清除率为 100%,逆行输尿管镜碎石术组为 89.7%(p=0.07)。微创经皮顺行输尿管镜碎石术和逆行输尿管镜碎石术的 EQ 值分别为 0.83 和 0.50。

结论

本研究表明,微创经皮顺行输尿管镜碎石术治疗大的嵌顿性近端输尿管结石可获得更高的结石清除率和安全性。

相似文献

1
Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.治疗大的嵌顿性上段输尿管结石:微创经皮顺行输尿管碎石术与逆行输尿管碎石术的随机比较。
World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1605-10. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1026-2. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
2
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性、大型、近端输尿管结石的比较
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Apr;24(4):204-9. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70118-9.
3
Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.大型嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的治疗:经皮顺行输尿管碎石术与逆行输尿管碎石术的随机对照研究
J Endourol. 2008 May;22(5):913-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0230.
4
Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Surgical Approaches for Complicated Impacted Proximal Ureteral Calculi Based on a New Scoring Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis.基于新评分标准对复杂嵌顿性近端输尿管结石不同手术方法疗效的比较:配对分析
J Endourol. 2023 Apr;37(4):462-466. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0669. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
5
Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与钬激光联合半硬性输尿管肾镜治疗近端输尿管大结石的比较。
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000142848.43880.b3.
6
Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized study.经皮闭塞球囊导管辅助输尿管镜碎石术治疗大型嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的临床疗效、安全性及成本:一项前瞻性随机研究
J Endourol. 2014 Sep;28(9):1064-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0167. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
7
Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy.前瞻性随机研究治疗大型上段输尿管结石:体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术与腹腔镜。
J Urol. 2012 Jan;187(1):164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.054. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
8
Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches to the management of large upper ureteral stones after shockwave lithotripsy failure: a four-year retrospective study.冲击波碎石治疗失败后处理大上段输尿管结石的逆行、顺行和腹腔镜方法:一项四年回顾性研究。
J Endourol. 2014 Jan;28(1):100-3. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0391. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
9
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial.输尿管镜钬激光碎石术(URSL)、逆行经皮肾镜取石术(RPLU)和微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)治疗大型上尿路嵌顿性输尿管结石的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验
BMC Urol. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0236-0.
10
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus ureteroscopic lithotomy for large (>15 mm) impacted upper ureteral stones in different locations: is the upper border of the fourth lumbar vertebra a good indication for choice of management method?经皮肾镜碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗不同部位的大 (>15mm) 嵌顿性上段输尿管结石:第四腰椎上缘是否是选择治疗方法的良好指征?
J Endourol. 2013 Sep;27(9):1120-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0535. Epub 2013 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of stone-free rates and complication profiles.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行性肾内手术:结石清除率和并发症情况的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04707-8.
2
A prospective comparative study between retrograde intrarenal surgery vs supine mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for single upper ureteric stones >10 mm.一项针对直径大于10毫米的单一上段输尿管结石,逆行性肾内手术与仰卧位微创经皮肾镜取石术的前瞻性对比研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(1):77-84. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.0205. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The double wire technique: an alternative method for difficult ureteroscopic access.双线技术:一种用于困难输尿管镜检查通路的替代方法。
Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):783-4. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0491-1. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
2
Treatment of ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.治疗输尿管和肾结石:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2569. Epub 2012 May 15.
3
Semirigid ureteroscopy in management of large proximal ureteral calculi: is there still a role in developing countries?
Miniperc percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of juxta uretero-pelvic junction upper ureteric calculi: A prospective, randomized control study.
微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部上段输尿管结石的前瞻性随机对照研究
Urol Ann. 2025 Jan-Mar;17(1):9-16. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_48_24. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
4
The assistive role of an internal fluid circulatory device in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a randomized, controlled and prospective study.内部流体循环装置在输尿管镜碎石术中的辅助作用:一项随机、对照、前瞻性研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun;57(6):1763-1770. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04359-0. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
5
Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.逆行性肾内结石手术中吸引技术与非吸引技术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Apr;57(4):1051-1062. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
6
Safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with 365 μm fibers of Ho: YAG laser: a short-term follow-up.钬激光 365μm 光纤行输尿管软镜碎石术的安全性:短期随访。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Oct 14;39(1):258. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04209-6.
7
Comparison Between Retrograde and Antegrade Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy for the Management of Medium-Sized Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Randomized Prospective Study.逆行与顺行输尿管镜激光碎石术治疗中段输尿管上段结石的比较:一项随机前瞻性研究
Cureus. 2024 Jun 26;16(6):e63196. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63196. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Percutaneous antegrade management of large proximal ureteral stones using non-papillary puncture.使用非乳头穿刺对近端输尿管大结石进行经皮顺行处理。
Asian J Urol. 2024 Jan;11(1):110-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
9
A Comparative Analysis between Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of >15 mm Non-Obstructing Proximal Ureteral Stones.软性输尿管镜碎石术与无管经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径>15mm非梗阻性近端输尿管结石的对比分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 7;12(24):7541. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247541.
10
Comparative study between antegrade flexible ureteroscopy and reterograde intrarenal surgery in the management of impacted upper ureteric stones 1.5 cm or larger.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行输尿管软镜碎石术治疗 1.5cm 或以上嵌顿性上段输尿管结石的对比研究
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3731-3736. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04672-w. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
半硬性输尿管镜治疗大型上段输尿管结石:发展中国家仍有其作用吗?
Urology. 2011 May;77(5):1064-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.067. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
4
Ultrasound-guided minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in flank position for management of complex renal calculi.超声引导下侧卧位微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性肾结石。
Urology. 2011 Jan;77(1):40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.054. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
5
A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.一项比较冲击波碎石术和半刚性输尿管镜治疗输尿管上段结石的前瞻性随机研究。
Urology. 2009 Dec;74(6):1216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.076. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
6
Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to less invasiveness? A prospective comparative study.经皮肾镜取石术中较小的通道是否会降低侵袭性?一项前瞻性对比研究。
Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
7
Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the Guangzhou experience.中国微创经皮肾镜取石术:广州经验
J Endourol. 2009 Oct;23(10):1693-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.1537.
8
Use of the Stone Cone for prevention of calculus retropulsion during holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: case series and review of the literature.使用结石锥体预防钬激光碎石术中结石后推:病例系列及文献综述
Urol Int. 2009;82(3):356-60. doi: 10.1159/000209372. Epub 2009 May 11.
9
Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.大型嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的治疗:经皮顺行输尿管碎石术与逆行输尿管碎石术的随机对照研究
J Endourol. 2008 May;22(5):913-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0230.
10
Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: predictive factors for complications and success.钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石:并发症及成功率的预测因素
J Endourol. 2008 Feb;22(2):257-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0299.