Hernández F, Rivera P, Sigarán M, Miranda J
Centro de Investigación y Diagnóstico en Parasitología, Facultad de Microbiología Universidad de Costa Rica, San José.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1991 Jan-Feb;33(1):80-2. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46651991000100015.
Helicobacter pylori was investigated in 189 patients for culture, microscopic visualization of campylobacter-like organisms (CLO) and a ten minute urease test. In 136 (72%) the bacteria was isolated, and in 98 of them CLO were histologically detected. Specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of microscopic visualization of CLO were: 0.77, 0.73, 0.97 and 0.51, respectively; 98 culture-positive patients were urease test positive. Specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of the urease test were: 0.83, 0.72, 0.92 and 0.54, respectively. Comparing the urease test with culture of H. pylori combined with microscopic visualization of CLO, its specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values were: 0.95, 0.71, 0.98 and 0.48, respectively. Probably, these values are not real, since bacteria different from H. pylori could be misclassified as CLO.
对189例患者进行了幽门螺杆菌检测,检测项目包括培养、弯曲杆菌样微生物(CLO)的显微镜观察以及10分钟尿素酶试验。136例(72%)分离出该细菌,其中98例通过组织学检测到CLO。CLO显微镜观察的特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为:0.77、0.73、0.97和0.51;98例培养阳性患者尿素酶试验呈阳性。尿素酶试验的特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为:0.83、0.72、0.92和0.54。将尿素酶试验与幽门螺杆菌培养结合CLO显微镜观察进行比较,其特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为:0.95、0.71、0.98和0.48。这些数值可能并非真实情况,因为不同于幽门螺杆菌的细菌可能被误分类为CLO。