Suppr超能文献

捕食风险的细微线索:椋鸟对捕食者的目光方向做出反应。

Subtle cues of predation risk: starlings respond to a predator's direction of eye-gaze.

作者信息

Carter Julia, Lyons Nicholas J, Cole Hannah L, Goldsmith Arthur R

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Aug 7;275(1644):1709-15. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0095.

Abstract

For prey animals to negotiate successfully the fundamental trade-off between predation and starvation, a realistic assessment of predation risk is vital. Prey responses to conspicuous indicators of risk (such as looming predators or fleeing conspecifics) are well documented, but there should also be strong selection for the detection of more subtle cues. A predator's head orientation and eye-gaze direction are good candidates for subtle but useful indicators of risk, since many predators orient their head and eyes towards their prey as they attack. We describe the first explicit demonstration of a bird responding to a live predator's eye-gaze direction. We present wild-caught European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) with human 'predators' whose frontal appearance and gaze direction are manipulated independently, and show that starlings are sensitive to the predator's orientation, the presence of eyes and the direction of eye-gaze. Starlings respond in a functionally significant manner: when the predator's gaze was averted, starlings resumed feeding earlier, at a higher rate and consumed more food overall. By correctly assessing lower risk and returning to feeding activity earlier (as in this study), the animal gains a competitive advantage over conspecifics that do not respond to the subtle predator cue in this way.

摘要

对于被捕食动物而言,要成功地在被捕食风险与饥饿之间进行基本权衡,对捕食风险进行现实评估至关重要。猎物对明显的风险指标(如逼近的捕食者或逃窜的同类)的反应已有充分记录,但对于更细微线索的察觉也应有强大的选择作用。捕食者的头部朝向和眼睛注视方向是风险的细微但有用指标的不错候选,因为许多捕食者在攻击时会将头部和眼睛朝向猎物。我们描述了鸟类对活捕食者眼睛注视方向做出反应的首个明确例证。我们让野生捕获的欧洲椋鸟(家八哥)面对人类“捕食者”,这些“捕食者”的正面外观和注视方向是独立操控的,结果表明椋鸟对捕食者的朝向、眼睛的存在以及眼睛注视方向很敏感。椋鸟的反应具有功能上的重要意义:当捕食者的目光转移时,椋鸟会更早恢复进食,进食速度更快,总体上消耗的食物更多。通过正确评估较低风险并更早恢复进食活动(如本研究中所示),动物相对于那些不以这种方式对捕食者细微线索做出反应的同类获得了竞争优势。

相似文献

1
Subtle cues of predation risk: starlings respond to a predator's direction of eye-gaze.
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Aug 7;275(1644):1709-15. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0095.
2
A behavioral analysis of prey detection lateralization and unilateral transfer in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).
Behav Processes. 2008 Nov;79(3):125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
3
Dynamics of prey-flock escaping behavior in response to predator's attack.
J Theor Biol. 2006 May 21;240(2):250-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.09.009. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
4
European starlings recognize the location of robotic conspecific attention.
Biol Lett. 2014 Oct;10(10):20140665. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0665.
5
European starlings use their acute vision to check on feline predators but not on conspecifics.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0188857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188857. eCollection 2018.
6
Oculomotor strategy of an avian ground forager: tilted and weakly yoked eye saccades.
J Exp Biol. 2015 Aug;218(Pt 16):2651-7. doi: 10.1242/jeb.122820. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
Do Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) and tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor) use predator eyes in risk assessment?
Anim Cogn. 2021 May;24(3):533-540. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01449-1. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
8
The impact of parasite manipulation and predator foraging behavior on predator-prey communities.
Ecology. 2006 Nov;87(11):2832-41. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2832:tiopma]2.0.co;2.
10
Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048497. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Cuckoo eyes are an important identification cue for the Oriental reed warbler host.
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2025 Jan 10;26:101038. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2025.101038. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Recognition of Predator Type and Risk Level in Azure-Winged Magpies () Through Visual and Auditory Cues.
Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec 16;14(12):e70749. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70749. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of eyespot anti-predator mechanisms.
Elife. 2024 Dec 12;13:RP96338. doi: 10.7554/eLife.96338.
4
Predator gaze captures both human and chimpanzee attention.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0311673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311673. eCollection 2024.
5
Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) gaze is conspicuous at ecologically-relevant distances.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 3;12(1):9249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13273-3.
6
The gaze of a social monkey is perceptible to conspecifics and predators but not prey.
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Jun 8;289(1976):20220194. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0194. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
7
Cephalopod Behavior: From Neural Plasticity to Consciousness.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Apr 12;15:787139. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.787139. eCollection 2021.
8
Animal cognition in an urbanised world.
Front Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 4;9. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.633947.
9
Great-tailed grackles can independently direct their eyes toward different targets.
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jul;239(7):2119-2126. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06122-8. Epub 2021 May 6.
10
The Role of Animal Cognition in Human-Wildlife Interactions.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 4;11:589978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589978. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance.
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Jul 1;13(7):284-7. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01327-5.
2
Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment.
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 22;272(1581):2627-34. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3251.
3
All great ape species follow gaze to distant locations and around barriers.
J Comp Psychol. 2005 May;119(2):145-54. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.145.
4
Ravens, Corvus corax, follow gaze direction of humans around obstacles.
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 7;271(1546):1331-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2738.
5
Body orientation and face orientation: two factors controlling apes' behavior from humans.
Anim Cogn. 2004 Oct;7(4):216-23. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0214-2.
6
A simple rule for the costs of vigilance: empirical evidence from a social forager.
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 7;271(1534):27-33. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2522.
7
Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of "looming".
Science. 1962 Jun 15;136(3520):982-3. doi: 10.1126/science.136.3520.982.
8
Good foragers can also be good at detecting predators.
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 May 22;270(1519):1069-76. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2353.
9
Bee-eaters ( Merops orientalis) respond to what a predator can see.
Anim Cogn. 2002 Dec;5(4):253-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-002-0155-6. Epub 2002 Nov 16.
10
Antipredator responses and defensive behavior: ecological and ethological approaches for the neurosciences.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001 Dec;25(7-8):577-86. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00042-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验