更好的报告，更好的研究：《公共科学图书馆·医学》中的指南与指导
Better reporting, better research: guidelines and guidance in PLoS Medicine.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2008 Apr 29;5(4):e99. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050099.
Abstract
announces a new section: Guidelines and Guidance.
摘要
宣布开设一个新板块
指南与指导。
相似文献
1
Better reporting, better research: guidelines and guidance in PLoS Medicine.更好的报告，更好的研究：《公共科学图书馆·医学》中的指南与指导
PLoS Med. 2008 Apr 29;5(4):e99. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050099.
2
Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!临床研究设计与报告：总有改进的空间！
Transfusion. 2007 Jan;47(1):2-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01085.x.
3
An update on data reporting standards.数据报告标准的最新情况。
Nat Cell Biol. 2014 May;16(5):385. doi: 10.1038/ncb2964.
4
Checklists and .检查表和…… （你提供的原文不完整，请补充完整以便准确翻译）
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jan;11(1):e004517. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004517.
5
On the pasta theory of reproductive research.关于生殖研究的意大利面理论。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1373. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey223.
6
How to review a paper for Heart.如何为《心脏》杂志审阅一篇论文。
Heart. 2015 Jan;101(1):3-4. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307135.
7
Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology.泌尿外科临床研究统计学报告的指南。
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):358-367. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.014. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Reporting sex as a biologic variable in research published in the Journal of Vascular Surgery Publications.在《血管外科杂志出版物》上发表的研究中将性别作为生物学变量进行报告。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Jan;7(1):7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.11.002.
9
Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.《欧洲泌尿外科杂志》统计数据报告指南
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
10
Fairness to all: gender and sex in scientific reporting.对所有人公平：科学报告中的性别与性
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):391-2. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3397-5. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
引用本文的文献
1
The natural history of conducting and reporting clinical trials: interviews with trialists.开展和报告临床试验的自然历程：对试验者的访谈
Trials. 2015 Jan 26;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0536-6.
2
Open science and reporting animal studies: who's accountable?开放科学与动物研究报告：谁来负责？
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jan;12(1):e1001757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
3
Better reporting of scientific studies: why it matters.更好地报告科学研究：为什么这很重要。
PLoS Med. 2013 Aug;10(8):e1001504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001504. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
4
Reporting guidelines and the American Journal of Public Health's adoption of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses.报告规范和《美国公共卫生杂志》对系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的采用。
Am J Public Health. 2012 May;102(5):780-4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300630. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
5
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network.透明准确的报告可提高研究的可靠性、实用性和影响力：报告指南和 EQUATOR 网络。
BMC Med. 2010 Apr 26;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-24.
6
Neglected external validity in reports of randomized trials: the example of hip and knee osteoarthritis.随机试验报告中被忽视的外部有效性：以髋膝关节骨关节炎为例。
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar 15;61(3):361-9. doi: 10.1002/art.24279.
本文引用的文献
1
CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration.《CONSORT 声明：期刊和会议摘要中随机对照试验报告的解释与详述》
PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 22;5(1):e20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050020.
2
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.流行病学观察性研究报告的强化（STROBE）：解释与详述
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297.
3
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《加强流行病学观察性研究报告（STROBE）声明》：观察性研究报告指南
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296.
4
Valid consent for genomic epidemiology in developing countries.发展中国家基因组流行病学的有效同意。
PLoS Med. 2007 Apr;4(4):e95. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040095.
5
Enrolling adolescents in research on HIV and other sensitive issues: lessons from South Africa.让青少年参与艾滋病病毒及其他敏感问题的研究：来自南非的经验教训。
PLoS Med. 2006 Jul;3(7):e180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030180. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
6
Data cleaning: detecting, diagnosing, and editing data abnormalities.数据清理：检测、诊断和编辑数据异常。
PLoS Med. 2005 Oct;2(10):e267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020267. Epub 2005 Sep 6.
7
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.CONSORT声明的使用与随机试验报告的质量：一项前后对比评估
JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):1992-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.15.1992.
Zotero 插件