开放科学与动物研究报告：谁来负责？
Open science and reporting animal studies: who's accountable?
机构信息
University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Public Library of Science, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
出版信息
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jan;12(1):e1001757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
Abstract
If being open means maximizing the number of people a paper can reach and minimizing the difficulties of re-using the information within it, then the release of all information associated with a paper is critical. For ethical reasons, high standards of reporting are extra critical in regards to animal research.
摘要
如果开放意味着最大限度地增加论文能够覆盖的人群数量，并最小化重新使用其中信息的难度，那么发布与论文相关的所有信息至关重要。出于伦理原因，动物研究方面的报告标准特别需要高标准。
相似文献
1
Open science and reporting animal studies: who's accountable?开放科学与动物研究报告：谁来负责？
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jan;12(1):e1001757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
2
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies.两年过去了：期刊尚未对临床前动物研究的报告标准强制执行 ARRIVE 指南。
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jan;12(1):e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001756. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
3
Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.改进生物科学研究报告：动物研究报告的ARRIVE指南
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Apr;20(4):256-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.010.
4
Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.改进生物科学研究报告：动物研究报告的ARRIVE指南
Vet Clin Pathol. 2012 Mar;41(1):27-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2012.00418.x.
5
The publication in Homeopathy of studies involving animal experimentation.《顺势疗法》杂志上发表的涉及动物实验的研究。
Homeopathy. 2016 Aug;105(3):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2016.07.001.
6
Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines.动物研究：体内实验报告：ARRIVE指南
J Physiol. 2010 Jul 15;588(Pt 14):2519-21. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.192278.
7
Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines.动物研究：体内实验报告：ARRIVE指南。
Exp Physiol. 2010 Aug;95(8):842-4. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.053793.
8
Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines.动物研究：体内实验报告：ARRIVE指南
J Gene Med. 2010 Jul;12(7):561-3. doi: 10.1002/jgm.1473.
9
Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines.动物研究：体内实验报告：ARRIVE指南
Br J Pharmacol. 2010 Aug;160(7):1577-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00872.x.
10
Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments--the ARRIVE guidelines.动物研究：体内实验报告——ARRIVE指南
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011 Apr;31(4):991-3. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.220. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
引用本文的文献
1
Recovering from depression with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies.采用重复经颅磁刺激（rTMS）治疗抑郁症的康复效果：临床前研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 10;10(1):393. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01055-2.
2
Scalable Measurements of Intrinsic Excitability in Human iPS Cell-Derived Excitatory Neurons Using All-Optical Electrophysiology.使用全光学电生理学技术对人诱导多能干细胞源性兴奋性神经元进行内在兴奋性的可扩展测量。
Neurochem Res. 2019 Mar;44(3):714-725. doi: 10.1007/s11064-018-2694-5. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
Impact of Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) Guidelines on Peri-Anesthesia Care for Rat Models of Stroke: A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Years 2005 and 2015.中风治疗学术产业圆桌会议（STAIR）指南对中风大鼠模型围麻醉期护理的影响：一项比较2005年和2015年的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 25;12(1):e0170243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170243. eCollection 2017.
4
Good Science, Good Sense and Good Sensibilities: The Three Ss of Carol Newton.好科学、好判断力与好情感：卡罗尔·牛顿的三个“S”
Animals (Basel). 2016 Nov 11;6(11):70. doi: 10.3390/ani6110070.
5
Optimized design and analysis of preclinical intervention studies in vivo.优化设计和分析临床前干预研究的体内实验。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 2;6:30723. doi: 10.1038/srep30723.
6
Pain and Laboratory Animals: Publication Practices for Better Data Reproducibility and Better Animal Welfare.疼痛与实验动物：为实现更好的数据可重复性和更好的动物福利的出版规范
PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155001. eCollection 2016.
7
A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals' Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale.使用一种新工具——EXEMPLAR量表批判性审视生物医学期刊关于动物研究的政策。
Animals (Basel). 2015 Apr 30;5(2):315-31. doi: 10.3390/ani5020315.
8
Quality of Animal Experiments in Anti-Angiogenic Cancer Drug Development--A Systematic Review.抗血管生成抗癌药物研发中动物实验的质量——一项系统评价
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0137235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137235. eCollection 2015.
9
A combined pre-clinical meta-analysis and randomized confirmatory trial approach to improve data validity for therapeutic target validation.一种结合临床前荟萃分析和随机验证性试验的方法，以提高治疗靶点验证的数据有效性。
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 27;5:13428. doi: 10.1038/srep13428.
10
Beyond bar and line graphs: time for a new data presentation paradigm.超越柱状图和折线图：是时候采用新的数据呈现范式了。
PLoS Biol. 2015 Apr 22;13(4):e1002128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002128. eCollection 2015 Apr.
本文引用的文献
1
Transparency in the reporting of in vivo pre-clinical pain research: The relevance and implications of the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) guidelines.体内临床前疼痛研究报告的透明度：ARRIVE（动物研究：体内实验报告）指南的相关性及影响
Scand J Pain. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2013.02.002.
2
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies.两年过去了：期刊尚未对临床前动物研究的报告标准强制执行 ARRIVE 指南。
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jan;12(1):e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001756. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
3
Architecting the future of research communication: building the models and analytics for an open access future.构建研究传播的未来：为开放获取的未来构建模型和分析。
PLoS Biol. 2013 Oct;11(10):e1001691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001691. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
4
Better reporting of scientific studies: why it matters.更好地报告科学研究：为什么这很重要。
PLoS Med. 2013 Aug;10(8):e1001504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001504. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
5
Translating translational research into global health gains.将转化医学研究成果转化为全球健康效益。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(7):e1001493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001493. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
6
Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseases.神经病学疾病动物研究中过度显著偏倚的评估。
PLoS Biol. 2013 Jul;11(7):e1001609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001609. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
7
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.停电：为什么小样本量会破坏神经科学的可靠性。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
8
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research.呼吁透明报告，以优化临床前研究的预测价值。
Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):187-91. doi: 10.1038/nature11556.
9
Publication guidelines for refereeing and reporting on animal use in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎中动物使用的评审和报告出版指南。
J Neuroimmunol. 2012 Jan 18;242(1-2):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
10
Changes to publication requirements made at the XVIII International Botanical Congress in Melbourne - what does e-publication mean for you?墨尔本第十八届国际植物学大会对出版要求的修改——电子出版对您意味着什么？
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Sep 14;11:250. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-250.
Zotero 插件