Castro Pablo, García-Vicente Feliciano, Mínguez Cristina, Floriano Alejandro, Sevillano David, Pérez Leopoldo, Torres Juan J
Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Departamento de Radiofísica, Hospital Universitario "La Princesa", Madrid, Spain.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008 Jan 22;9(1):70-86. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v9i1.2676.
To achieve a good clinical outcome in radiotherapy treatment, a certain accuracy in the dose delivered to the patient is required. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the uncertainty in each of the steps of the process inside some acceptable values, which implies a global uncertainty as low as possible. This work is focused on the uncertainty evaluation of absorbed dose to water in the routine calibration for clinical beams, in the range of energies used in external radiotherapy. With this aim, different uncertainty components (corrected electrometer reading, calibration factor, beam quality correction factor and reference conditions) associated to beam calibration have been considered. Results show a typical uncertainty in the determination of absorbed dose to water during beam calibration around 1.3% for photon beams and 1.5% for electron beams (k=1 in both cases) when the N(D,w) formalism is used and is theoretically calculated. These values may be different depending on the uncertainty provided by the standards laboratory for calibration factor, which is shown in the work. If the total application of the N(D,w) formalism, that is to say, specific calibrations of each chamber in the user's beam qualities, is taken into account the uncertainty in this step of the process could be placed close to 1.0%. Furthermore, the possibility of an uncertainty reduction with the absorbed dose to water formalism adoption against the air kerma one is discussed.
为在放射治疗中获得良好的临床效果,需要向患者输送的剂量具有一定的准确性。因此,有必要将该过程每个步骤中的不确定性控制在某些可接受的值范围内,这意味着全局不确定性要尽可能低。这项工作聚焦于临床射束常规校准中水中吸收剂量的不确定性评估,校准范围为外照射放疗中使用的能量范围。为此,已考虑了与射束校准相关的不同不确定性分量(校正后的静电计读数、校准因子、射束质量校正因子和参考条件)。结果表明,当使用N(D,w)形式并进行理论计算时,射束校准期间水中吸收剂量测定的典型不确定性对于光子束约为1.3%,对于电子束约为1.5%(两种情况下k均为1)。这些值可能会因标准实验室提供的校准因子不确定性而有所不同,这在工作中有所体现。如果考虑N(D,w)形式的全面应用,也就是说,对用户射束质量下的每个电离室进行特定校准,那么该过程这一步骤中的不确定性可能接近1.0%。此外,还讨论了采用水中吸收剂量形式相对于空气比释动能形式降低不确定性的可能性。