Suppr超能文献

外照射放疗校准过程中水中吸收剂量测定的不确定性研究。

Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration.

作者信息

Castro Pablo, García-Vicente Feliciano, Mínguez Cristina, Floriano Alejandro, Sevillano David, Pérez Leopoldo, Torres Juan J

机构信息

Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Departamento de Radiofísica, Hospital Universitario "La Princesa", Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008 Jan 22;9(1):70-86. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v9i1.2676.

Abstract

To achieve a good clinical outcome in radiotherapy treatment, a certain accuracy in the dose delivered to the patient is required. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the uncertainty in each of the steps of the process inside some acceptable values, which implies a global uncertainty as low as possible. This work is focused on the uncertainty evaluation of absorbed dose to water in the routine calibration for clinical beams, in the range of energies used in external radiotherapy. With this aim, different uncertainty components (corrected electrometer reading, calibration factor, beam quality correction factor and reference conditions) associated to beam calibration have been considered. Results show a typical uncertainty in the determination of absorbed dose to water during beam calibration around 1.3% for photon beams and 1.5% for electron beams (k=1 in both cases) when the N(D,w) formalism is used and is theoretically calculated. These values may be different depending on the uncertainty provided by the standards laboratory for calibration factor, which is shown in the work. If the total application of the N(D,w) formalism, that is to say, specific calibrations of each chamber in the user's beam qualities, is taken into account the uncertainty in this step of the process could be placed close to 1.0%. Furthermore, the possibility of an uncertainty reduction with the absorbed dose to water formalism adoption against the air kerma one is discussed.

摘要

为在放射治疗中获得良好的临床效果,需要向患者输送的剂量具有一定的准确性。因此,有必要将该过程每个步骤中的不确定性控制在某些可接受的值范围内,这意味着全局不确定性要尽可能低。这项工作聚焦于临床射束常规校准中水中吸收剂量的不确定性评估,校准范围为外照射放疗中使用的能量范围。为此,已考虑了与射束校准相关的不同不确定性分量(校正后的静电计读数、校准因子、射束质量校正因子和参考条件)。结果表明,当使用N(D,w)形式并进行理论计算时,射束校准期间水中吸收剂量测定的典型不确定性对于光子束约为1.3%,对于电子束约为1.5%(两种情况下k均为1)。这些值可能会因标准实验室提供的校准因子不确定性而有所不同,这在工作中有所体现。如果考虑N(D,w)形式的全面应用,也就是说,对用户射束质量下的每个电离室进行特定校准,那么该过程这一步骤中的不确定性可能接近1.0%。此外,还讨论了采用水中吸收剂量形式相对于空气比释动能形式降低不确定性的可能性。

相似文献

5
Ionization chamber-based reference dosimetry of intensity modulated radiation beams.
Med Phys. 2004 Sep;31(9):2454-65. doi: 10.1118/1.1781333.

引用本文的文献

2
Monte Carlo evaluation of uncertainties in photon and electron TG-51 absorbed dose calibration.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Jul;25(7):e14339. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14339. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
4
Variation in Dosimeter Calibration Factor (N) Over a Period of 20 Years.
J Med Phys. 2021 Apr-Jun;46(2):125-127. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_42_21. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
5
Evaluation of the Lung Dose in Three-dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy of Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Phantom Study.
J Med Signals Sens. 2020 Feb 6;10(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_1_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
6
Glamour, expression, and consequences of tattoos in radiation treatment.
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 7;14(8):e0220030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220030. eCollection 2019.
7
Uncertainty in positioning ion chamber at reference depth for various water phantoms.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018 May-Jun;23(3):199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
8
Direct megavoltage photon calibration service in Australia.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2014 Dec;37(4):753-61. doi: 10.1007/s13246-014-0293-6. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Polarity effect of plane-parallel ionization chambers in electron radiation.
Phys Med Biol. 1994 Feb;39(2):299-304. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/39/2/007.
2
Thermal and temporal response of ionization chambers in radiation dosimetry.
Med Phys. 2004 Mar;31(3):573-8. doi: 10.1118/1.1644520.
4
The use of plane-parallel chambers in electron dosimetry without any cross-calibration.
Phys Med Biol. 2002 May 7;47(9):N121-6. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/9/402.
5
[Practical electron dosimetry. A comparison of different types of ionization chambers].
Z Med Phys. 2002;12(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/s0939-3889(15)70540-4.
8
Determination of absorbed dose calibration factors for therapy level electron beam ionization chambers.
Phys Med Biol. 2001 Mar;46(3):741-55. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/3/310.
10
The saturation loss for plane parallel ionization chambers at high dose per pulse values.
Phys Med Biol. 2000 Jul;45(7):1869-83. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/7/312.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验